Originally posted by Ouallada
I can even repeat slowly if you still cannot comprehend it.
Sorry illogical bullshit is hard for me to understand, just as logical reaosning is hard for you to understand.
Originally posted by Ouallada
Do quote me on that. Hulk is faulty because this analogy requires two beings of similar physical states, save strength and skill. keep avoiding that though.
and the two are pretty similar... except for the size thing, but you don't HAVE to be the same height and weight as a weight lifter in order to have a martial art's black belt.
So no this is a stipulation that you yourself are putting on something that doesn't exist in the real world.
weight lifter:
http://www.flatrock.org.nz/topics/drugs/assets/weightlifter.jpg
Black belt:
http://www.northeastopen.com/judges/noguera.jpg
Physically the same? Nope...
Originally posted by Ouallada
I have already posted an actual weightlifter. Why use Hulk when we have a weightlifter? After all, according to you, wolverine is apparently just a black belt. Who wins then?
I'm sorry didn't your comparison use that real world eight lifter versus wolverine? And you were talking about needing to have them be physically the same earlier? Way to contradict yourself
Originally posted by Ouallada
Thanos does not equal skill,
Then how can you use him to represent skill if he's not skill?
Originally posted by Ouallada
but he is definitely more skilled at H2H than hulk.
but he's not as skilled as a black belt, which is why your example doesn't work.
Originally posted by Ouallada
To hulk, Thanos could well equate to skill.
But still not a black belt where Hulk is a weightlifter...
Originally posted by Ouallada
The question still stands. Apparently it is fair to pair a low/mid herald with a street-level just because hulk is a "weightlifter".
So hulk DOES NOT represent strength? You're clearly not following the conversation properly. Strength was brought up. The weight lifter was brought up at the same time as the Hulk. that set our standard for the weight lifter. You don't like it take it up with quanchi.
Originally posted by Ouallada
Surely I would be correct to pair an actual weightlifter with wolverine then, by your logic?
Hardly. What was that about controls and variables?
OH yeah hulk has an awesome healing factor... and since Wolverine doesn't he doesn't qualify... except that wolverine DOES have an awesome healing factor...
Originally posted by Ouallada
it sounds pretty stupid, but then and again, it's your logic.
Nope, a perversion of my logic is not my logic. And clearly since Thanos is not skill he does not qualify. and since the real world weight lifter doesn't have the healing factor he doesn't qualify by either of our logics...
If I wanted to ignore the haling factor I could have gone with Dardevil or Batman vs the Hulk... but I went with a skilled guy that has a healing factor... you? You didn't even go with a blackbelt level guy...
Originally posted by Ouallada
So says the person who doesn't understand a simple analogy.
No, that's YOU who doesn't understand. I understand a simple analogy just fine. I also recognize the false analogy fallacy.
Originally posted by Ouallada
You did notice I said "ignore". Of course, you have not answered anything about hulk being far faster than wolverine ever will be, or how his healing factor is superior.
Oh yes the Hulk is faster which is why Wolverine usually dances around Hulk pretty well... 🙄
Originally posted by Ouallada
Heal from a skeleton? Been there, done that. More than once.
As has wolverine. More than once. I fail to see what this proves.
"Oh my guy has done the same things as your guy! that means my guy can do the things your guy can do better!"
Keep thinking that...
Originally posted by Ouallada
Of hulk? Time to clutch at straws, I reckon.
ITs what you've been doing ALL along... Thanos is a blackbelt. 😂
Originally posted by Ouallada
Of course, but then and again I'm simply following your logic. Hulk = weightlifter, so Thanos, a guy who beat Hulk and Thing together H2H
With a backhand... thus being strength not actual skill thus fail.
Originally posted by Ouallada
and who trained Gamorra should at least be above wolverine, whom you consider a blackbelt. Where's the problem?
ad hoc reasoning. A>B and C<D therefore A>D!
Originally posted by Ouallada
Course not. Would Reed expect Thing to understand quantum physics?
That's hilarious... I said I wasn't expecting intelligence from you and then you say that Reed doesn't expect understanding from thing...
Love the comparison.
I don't expect intelligence
Reed doesn't expect understanding.
Thank you. 🙂
Originally posted by Ouallada
I don't expect you to understand everything either. I'll be patient. And nurturing.
Which is funny since you haven't understood what's been going on except the fanboy reasoning you and quanchi keep spouting. and Phantom Zone and King Kandy keep swallowing. and regurgitating to small degrees.
Originally posted by Ouallada
Let me rephrase. 2+2=4. If you're the only person who says 2+2 =25, you're wrong.
Obviously if people agree on something that happens to be true that means that there is no such thing as an appeal to the populus fallacy, and there for whenever a group of people agree with something it has to be right!
Or you know not... it just means they happen to agree with something that's right. Of course using the reaosning that 2+2=4 BECAUSE the people agree is still the ad populem fallacy. The conclusion is right, the justification for why is wrong.
The sky is blue because Ice Cream tastes like purple.
Originally posted by Ouallada
Of course, according to you, understanding = ad populem. Wonderful.[]/b]
Haha no... ad populem is appealing to the people. "All these people understand why don't you?"
You'll note that throughout the history of mankind its been the minority of people with the true understanding of what's happening and the masses who all think something innaccurately had the common understanding... Lets talk about the world is flat because it was the understanding of the majority of people that it was flat as compared to the few who first figured out it was not... Since reality is dictated by the masses, clearly the earth is flat. Or you know not... sicnce the majority of people were wrong.
Originally posted by Ouallada
[B]I love how people say this after trying to justify their psuedo-fallacies.
I'm not the one that's trying to justify a fallacy here mr "If most people say 2+2=4 while you say 2+2=25, therefore the majority of people are right!"
But hey you can defend wolverine beating lobo and Storm beating wonder woman... I'll just call you what you are... a marvel Fanboy... Hey its true. you ignore logic and reasoning in favor of the fallacy of ad populem.
Originally posted by Ouallada
Why, thank you, but I know how sharp my tongue is. No need to tell me what I already know.
You're ears are still stuffed with cotton.. figuratively speaking of course.
Originally posted by Ouallada
Pretty obvious, isn't it? There isn't one.
There isn't one because you refuse to see it?
Wishful thinking fallacy.
Originally posted by Ouallada
How can I see a quote which you have not given me? Go on. I want a quote in which quanchi explicitly stated that. With emphasis on explicitly. I am a patient person, no worries.
Just not a very observant one or one who's good at comprehending.
I gave a post where quanchi says this isn't a strength contest its a vs match(fight)
It obvious that you can't understand his implications that Strength isn't used in a fight at that time... CAUSE YOU DON'T WANT TO!
You only see what you want to see... which is why somehow you took sarcasm as bieng literal...