You don't really have to respond, I understand what you were sayin,
and I respect that,
but I just wanted to clear up what I was sayin,
just for the record.
Originally posted by Mr. Slippyfist He was struggling with the Soul Gem.
He wasn't struggling with the omnipotent power of the Power Gem.
All the Gems are omnipotent, concerning the respective concept they control.
Originally posted by Mr. Slippyfist And besides,
the Soul Gem stopped interfering as soon as Surfer showed up anyway.
Not exactly.
To the very end,
the Soul Gem was interfering:
The Soul Gem even curses Rune was disturbing its plan with the struggle:
Originally posted by Mr. Slippyfist Of course you do.
And IMO the statement is vague. Obviously your opinion>mine.
OK, cool.
No need for this underlined sarcasm, it's gibberish, and you know it. 😛
Originally posted by Mr. Slippyfist OK, and why should that matter?
He still held omnipotent power no matter how you spin it,
did he not have the Power Gem?
Imo:
Originally posted by Mr. Slippyfist LT confirms what either side believes.
Nv... Fangirl believes it was together, and you believe it was alone.
The statement is not cut and dry if you decide to only use that for proof... which you were doing.
I disagree.
"One of the Omnipotent Infinity Gems"
Imo
When the LT is stating this, he's referring to the Gems individually,
this is why an artistic visualization is depicted of the individuals,
carrying the Gems individually:
Originally posted by Mr. Slippyfist What does "EDIT" mean then? [/B]
It means bio writers can go in and adjust updated info.
But go ahead and join the site, and try to edit something yourself.
Originally posted by Mr. Slippyfist OK, cool. But I don't care. And don't kid yourself, you're obviously going to post it in an attempt to thwart me anyway
(even though it has no effect on anything I said).
I can already see it.
It's a legitimate bio entry, if you wish to dismiss it, that's on you.
And, it may not affect what you said,
but it coincides with what I said about the Gems concerning their individuality.
Originally posted by Mr. Slippyfist Plus, why would you have to crop it?
If it's the same bio, it's only a tiny read.
Yea, but I have to go into my storage, to find the corresponding Handbook,
then burn it, then crop it,
then upload it,
then post it on kmc.
I'll hit you up tomorrow though. 🙂
Originally posted by Mr. Slippyfist Anyway, all I'm saying is that that statement is questionable.
And questioning Marvel.com.
Nothing more, nothing less.
I never said that the Gems weren't omnipotent alone.
Fair enough, I respect your opinion always.
Originally posted by Mr. Slippyfist And yes, I was poking fun at the Gems getting beat by Surfer,
because it was the biggest pis I've ever seen in a comic.
I feel like I have to say what I'm doing, so I'll say it.
Cool.
I agree for the most part, but at-least they tried to throw in the stipulation,
which while it is a cheap attempt at an excuse,
at-least there is one.
Originally posted by Mr. Slippyfist And so we enter the 'oppose me? debate me!' stage... woot, fun.
Nah.
But I like your style B. 👆
We'll just agree, to disagree on this one.