Thor amped with the power gem vs Hank amped with rings

Started by Mr Master20 pages

==================================

Here's a bit of perspective on a single Gem's potential,
actually on it's power period:

==================================

Rune, with the Time Gem only ... completely freezes the entire Time-stream:

Indeed ....

... the Living Tribunal himself confirms the feat:

Notice the LT also states,

that all the Gems are Omnipotent (concerning the concept they control of course)

Originally posted by Mr Master
==================================

Here's a bit of perspective on a single Gem's potential,
actually on it's power period:

==================================

Rune, with the Time Gem only ... [B]completely freezes the entire Time-stream:

Indeed ....

... the Living Tribunal himself confirms the feat:

Notice the LT also states,

that all the Gems are Omnipotent (concerning the concept they control of course) [/B]

So then Thor with the PG SHOULD HAVE been able to blast everyone he fought into paste at one time correct? if the gem gave him unlimted power. right or wrong?

Originally posted by Mr Master ==================================Here's a bit of perspective on a single Gem's potential, actually on it's power period:==================================Rune, with the Time Gem only ... [B]completely freezes the entire Time-stream:Indeed ....... the Living Tribunal himself confirms the feat:Notice the LT also states,that all the Gems are Omnipotent (concerning the concept they control of course) [/B]
wait just one_ cotton picking minute. the lt does NOT state that each gem is omnipotent. he calls the GEMS omnipotent. as in all together. try again. cuz CLEARLY you are putting words down that are NOT on the paper. any casual on looker would take what you said and run with that. THAT IS NOT ON THE PAGE. fangirl101 score 1.

Originally posted by fangirl101
wait just one_ cotton picking minute.
you know, that would be pretty offensive, unless you were black...just saying.

Originally posted by Starscream M
you know, that would be pretty offensive, unless you were black...just saying.
I was thinking the same thing...

Originally posted by Starscream M
you know, that would be pretty offensive, unless you were black...just saying.

bi racial. does that count?

Originally posted by fangirl101
bi racial. does that count?
so you're part black, likes boys, and has a DC bias....hmmmm

just saying

Originally posted by Starscream M
so you're part black, likes boys, and has a DC bias....hmmmm

just saying

ug. dc bias? i absolutely hate superman and batman. dc's biggest icons. i am certainly not dc biased.

Originally posted by fangirl101
ug. dc bias? i absolutely hate superman and batman. dc's biggest icons. i am certainly not dc biased.
Nver hates Superman as well. He also loved sticking up for the new gods and loved WW. Such similarities between the two of you.

Originally posted by fangirl101
ug. dc bias? i absolutely hate superman and batman. dc's biggest icons. i am certainly not dc biased.
aha! so you don't deny liking men...gotcha!

Originally posted by quanchi112
Nver hates Superman as well. He also loved sticking up for the new gods and loved WW. Such similarities between the two of you.
i've read a lot of this guy's post. he and i differ some. but i dont' see why he got banned. i've seen worse from others since i've joined a few days ago. i guess life isn't fair.

Originally posted by Starscream M
aha! so you don't deny liking men...gotcha!

um, i am a girl. girls are supposed to like men. it's in the bible.

Originally posted by fangirl101
um, i am a girl. girls are supposed to like men. it's in the bible.
and girls don't exist on the internets...that's also in the bible

Originally posted by fangirl101
i've read a lot of this guy's post. he and i differ some. but i dont' see why he got banned. i've seen worse from others since i've joined a few days ago. i guess life isn't fair.
I never wanted nver banned. He went out without a bang and I never knew what comment made this happen. The reason he was banned is because he always bashed and couldnt control himself. I even tried helping him to diffuse some of the situations. Sometimes we got into it but I never hated the guy and laughed at a lot of the things he posted. He was quite humorous.

Originally posted by Starscream M
and girls don't exist on the internets...that's also in the bible
the 100 million women with myspace accounts disagree.

Originally posted by quanchi112
I never wanted nver banned. He went out without a bang and I never knew what comment made this happen. The reason he was banned is because he always bashed and couldnt control himself. I even tried helping him to diffuse some of the situations. Sometimes we got into it but I never hated the guy and laughed at a lot of the things he posted. He was quite humorous.

one thing that i do like about him, even tho he was an over emotional queer nut job, his sig ROCKED.

Originally posted by fangirl101
i've read a lot of this guy's post. he and i differ some. but i dont' see why he got banned. i've seen worse from others since i've joined a few days ago. i guess life isn't fair.
😐

Well, that post certainly sealed your fate.

Originally posted by fangirl101
one thing that i do like about him, even tho he was an over emotional queer nut job, his sig ROCKED.
oh cut out the act...insulting nvr doesn't convince anybody who you are

there aren't many black, gay, WW-loving drama queens on KMC

Originally posted by Mr. Slippyfist
😐

Well, that post certainly sealed your fate.

Let him be bran.

Originally posted by fangirl101
one thing that i do like about him, even tho he was an over emotional queer nut job, his sig ROCKED.
You've been here 12 days, and you already figured out how to search through a certain member's posts, and find out he was what you said?

It took me a couple months to figure out how to search for shit like that.

You should have just stuck with the 'whos nvr?' route.