Hackn'slash Luke vs. Dooku

Started by Sidi-Boy3 pages

Oops, typo xD I meant to say that my opinion is mostly not based on CGI and such.

Also, by the way, according to Lucas, fights in the OT were weaker because Vader is a cripple, Obi-Wan's an old man, and Luke's a kid. He didn't say it was because the speciale effects were inferior.

Originally posted by Sidi-Boy
Oops, typo xD I meant to say that my opinion is mostly not based on CGI and such.

Also, by the way, according to Lucas, fights in the OT were weaker because Vader is a cripple, Obi-Wan's an old man, and Luke's a kid. He didn't say it was because the speciale effects were inferior.

lol if that is true then george lucas is pathetically contradicting himself and introducing another plot hole.

becuase grevous was even more crippled than vader and they both pretty much had the same surgery (of course grevous had many more parts replaced)

but grevous had 100X the mobility

dooku was an old man but he was extremely mobile

the padawan that got killed infront of bail organa was a kid was a kid but he was very mobile

so i think its back to cgi and coreography

Since its ROTJ Luke vs. (I'm assuming ROTS) Dooku, I'll say that Dooku wins.
Now if it were Legacy of the Force era Luke, Dooku would be so boned.