Originally posted by KidRock
Are you drunk?
So the millions of dollars gained by Mrs. Kerry have resulted in more supposedly innocent deaths than have the millions garnered by Mr.McCain's wife's millions gained by the accidental births caused by alcohol-induced sexual encounters?
Or do absent-minded sexual encounters only happen from non-McCain hard liquor?
You seem to suddenly take exception to the Rove/Bush playbook. Why? Which is best for A'mer'ca? Or is that not very "American Badass" for your tastes?
Originally posted by Devil King
So the millions of dollars gained by Mrs. Kerry [b]have resulted in more supposedly innocent deaths than have the millions garnered by Mr.McCain's wife's millions gained by the accidental births caused by alcohol-induced sexual encounters?Or do absent-minded sexual encounters only happen from non-McCain hard liquor?
You seem to suddenly take exception to the Rove/Bush playbook. Why? Which is best for A'mer'ca? Or is that not very "American Badass" for your tastes? [/B]
I questioned your soberness because what you said came out of nowhere and was quite random.
I now realize its just another petty attack on republicans and I realized your a democrat..so no real surprise.
And are you saying its the McCains fault that people decide to drink and have sexual encounters then have abortions..thats your stance?
So I guess you support the Kerrys butchering millions of oceanlife creatures because of people throwing their plastic ketchup bottles into the ocean after a beachside BBQ..correct?
Originally posted by KidRock
And are you saying its the McCains fault that people decide to drink and have sexual encounters then have abortions..thats your stance?
No, I'm saying it's an enevitable side-effect of the legal drug your candidate's wife pedals as a means to support her "wearing jeans, relaxing in my sea-side condo" photoshoot. Many babies died to buy that Evil-Lyn-looking whore her many dollars and designer jeans. Does that strike you as splitting hairs? How liberal of you.
Maybe only rich people can run for president, but only 1 of the 2 (3) are running on a platform of moral superiority because he claims to disagree with abortion, but his wife sells and earns off the no. 1 legal drug that is blamed for the irressposibility and misdeeds which leads to the descision to abort.
Have more babies been aborted because they were concieved over beer, or have more been aborted because they were concieved over ketchup?
Don't hate the Rove/Bush play book, just because it's suddenly been turned against you.
Originally posted by Devil King
Have more babies been aborted because they were concieved over beer, or have more been aborted because they were concieved over ketchup?
Just a personal observation here, but of all the friends I had in college, most of the married ones who were major drunks/potheads have no kids, and most of the married ones who didn't do anything are a Jan, Bobby, and Cindy short of a Brady Bunch.
And since a good portion of the latter were fat, I'd assume they consumed a lot of ketchup on fries and burgers.
Originally posted by Schecter
i was being facetious about the japan bit. point is in order for your example to be relevant we would have to be at war with the iraqi government, win, get their surrender, forbid them their own military, etc. that however is not the case.
Not relevant to my point.
No one can get the US out of Iraq without facing overwhelming unintended consequences. It does not matter how we got there. Therefore, I do not believe Obama when he says that he will pull out the troops. A Precedent Obama will not put his own presidency at risk by doing such a thing. I think he will pull out a token number of troops and announce that he has pulled the troops out, but we will still be there. This is not exclusive to Obama; I don't believe any of them when they say they will pull the troops.