OneDumbG0
Find Your Own Fire
^ His ruling was proof. I'm offering you character propensity as proof against it. You're suggesting that Thanos and Doom, among others, look like idiots shutting off, or keeping off their forcefields when they could definitely have used them. For the sake of... what? A body armor durability feat that requires they deactivated their forcefield off-panel? I'm positing to you, that with their personalities, with their knowledge, with the situations they were in, it's not likely they would be so careless or foolish. And because they're not so careless or foolish, this is an instance where the forcefield is simply not drawn or narrated.
Originally posted by The Nuul
But this is Doom, we are talking about THANOS. Nice try.
That's your answer? Really? After all this talk about how if they're not illustrated or mentioned in that specific issue, you can't assume he used them. Which necessarily means that he was stupid and deactivated them off-panel.
Doom surviving getting thrown violently from the Worldship is now a pure armor durability feat that also shows how retarded Doom is to turn off his forcefields on a dangerous mission?
In the same way, Thanos' fights with Tyrant and Odin was a pure armor durability feat that also shows how retarded Thanos is to deactivate his shields off-panel right before heading into two dangerous fights?
This is an illustration of why this reasoning requires you to conclude the absurd. The decension into absurdity should reveal to you why we should not ignore character propensity at the expense of the character's personality... just to aggrandize a single (or two) durability feat(s).