Tyrant "depowered" vs. Odin

Originally posted by Utrigita
First of Galactus didn't had help in his encounter with Tyrant before Morg Arrived, so you mentioning of him losing with help is incorrect, so it's not fact.

He was losing in both scenarious in none was he defeated, he was down in both. Expect that Thanos didn't defeat Odin, at the very best one would say a Stalemate.

Odin quit on his own and Thanos was fine which means stalemate. tyrant quit because Morg used the un and interfered as he wouldnt have stopped on his own.

Not going to debate this, but a one sided beat down is hardly the same as a stalemate.

Originally posted by quanchi112
He sensed his distree and pain. Galactus felt much pain from Tyrant and even the Surfer tried getting there before they destroyed each other. He wasnt going there to save Tyrant from Galactus but acted as if they were equals. Tyrant had him on the ropes which was the whole reason Morg showed up anyways because he doubted his master and knew he needed help.

Much pain? Besides having his energy drain, all he did was let out one yell from a cut on the nose. Tyrant screamed more than that when Galactus blasted him. SS wasn't trying to get there to save them from each other. SS sensed Galactus' fear after Morg showed up with the UN. That's what Galactus was afraid of, not Tyrant.

Originally posted by quanchi112
Thanos was singed. He wasnt bleeding at all and didnt scream out in agony like Galactus did.

If you think blood coming from a nose is worse than struggling just to get on your feet, then you must have never watched a boxing match.

Originally posted by quanchi112
He was losing fact.

Odin quit on his own and Thanos was fine which means stalemate. tyrant quit because Morg used the un and interfered as he wouldnt have stopped on his own.

Odin didn't quit on his own. He quit because Beta Ray Bill and Sif interfered. That doesn't mean stalemate. A stalemate is when both sides are of equal force. That battle was very much one-sided.

Originally posted by celestialdemon
A stalemate is when both sides are of equal force. That battle was very much one-sided.

Agreed.

I wouldn't say it was stalemate Odin Vs. Thanos, because it was clearly seen Odin was more powerful.
I would chose DP Tyrant against Odin. DP Tyrant was also more impressive against those six powerful being than Odin against Thanos.
And Thanos when faced DP Tyrant was more powerful when facing Odin and still actually pretty much ran and didn't continue the battle, while against Odin he didn't want to give up.
He was getting the better against Galactus in their 2nd bout.
Galactus knows Tyrant is no joke in any form. It was like he was treating him as equal. And seeing their both confrontation, you would know why he sees Tyrant that way.

And Marvel needs to bring Tyrant back and to bring him back in full power.

It isn't fair to simply say that Tyrant takes it because he did better against Thanos (arguable). A counter-argument would be that Tyrant failed to one-shot SS, while we all know what Odin did to SS.

And Tyrant was hurt by Ganymede....

Originally posted by quanchi112
He was losing fact.

Odin quit on his own and Thanos was fine which means stalemate. tyrant quit because Morg used the un and interfered as he wouldnt have stopped on his own.

He didn't had help fact in his confrontation with tyrant, hence you statement partially incorrect. And the Moment Galactus was losing was the moment he hooked Tyrant to the Machine.

When did Odin quit from his battle with Thanos? What I find fun about that incident is that Tyrant with his great command over Technopathy couldn't dissemple the UN but Galactus could have done it safely had he had more energy that's however just a observation.

Originally posted by Xplosive
I wouldn't say it was stalemate Odin Vs. Thanos, because it was clearly seen Odin was more powerful.
I would chose DP Tyrant against Odin. DP Tyrant was also more impressive against those six powerful being than Odin against Thanos.
And Thanos when faced DP Tyrant was more powerful when facing Odin and still actually pretty much ran and didn't continue the battle, while against Odin he didn't want to give up.
He was getting the better against Galactus in their 2nd bout.
Galactus knows Tyrant is no joke in any form. It was like he was treating him as equal. And seeing their both confrontation, you would know why he sees Tyrant that way.

And Marvel needs to bring Tyrant back and to bring him back in full power.

I am hoping the big evil(event?) warlock sensed in GOTG is tyrant!

When i first got the reveal it was ultron behind the latest cosmic muckety muck, i thought....why not tyrant......but i agree....BRING TYRANT BACK!

Originally posted by Ouallada
It isn't fair to simply say that Tyrant takes it because he did better against Thanos (arguable). A counter-argument would be that Tyrant failed to one-shot SS, while we all know what Odin did to SS.

Surfer was bloodlusted vs. Tyrant. His attack on Odin was lazy and lacked effort. He could've continued attacking but Odin is one of the good guys.

Originally posted by Sundipped
Surfer was bloodlusted vs. Tyrant. His attack on Odin was lazy and lacked effort. He could've continued attacking but Odin is one of the good guys.

Dripping with lies.

Originally posted by celestialdemon
Dripping with lies.

Did u see the look on Surfers face when the heroes entered Tyrant's ship? He swore Tyrant was going down. He tried his best. This was not the case when the watch entered Asgard. Surfer made a horrible attempt at Odin then let Thanos take over.

Originally posted by Sundipped
Did u see the look on Surfers face when the heroes entered Tyrant's ship? He swore Tyrant was going down. He tried his best. This was not the case when the watch entered Asgard. Surfer made a horrible attempt at Odin then let Thanos take over.

Yes, and did you see that weak first attack he threw at Tyrant. He gradually made his attacks more and more powerful the longer the battle went. Against Odin, Surfer shot Odin twice (once at the same time as Thanos), and then Odin knocked him out of the battle.

Originally posted by Sundipped
Surfer was bloodlusted vs. Tyrant. His attack on Odin was lazy and lacked effort. He could've continued attacking but Odin is one of the good guys.

Speculation.

Norrin wasn't bloodlusted either....

Originally posted by llagrok
Speculation.

Norrin wasn't bloodlusted either....

Damn. If not in this case was he ever?
Surfer quote"Only one of us will stand when this day is done".
Against someone who he knows (but won't admit it) is far stronger than him, how can he not be going all out?

Originally posted by celestialdemon
Yes, and did you see that weak first attack he threw at Tyrant. He gradually made his attacks more and more powerful the longer the battle went. Against Odin, Surfer shot Odin twice (once at the same time as Thanos), and then Odin knocked him out of the battle.

Who are u talking about? Surfer? His first attack hit Tyrant dead in the face with no effect. None of Surfer's attacks had any effect. Tyrant's cosmic vision dropped Surfer after he was done toying with the heroes.

Big talk, Surfer doesn't kill.

Originally posted by llagrok
Big talk, Surfer doesn't kill.

He didn't say kill.

Odin.