Originally posted by Rage.Of.Olympus
😬Not really. Whether you want to believe or not, if Thor was harmed by Wolverine's claws, then a lot of shit his done doesn’t even remotely make sense. True, energy/blunt resistance don’t correlate with piercing, but Thor has higher end feats in those categories as well. Really high end. Heck, simply taking a punch from the Destroyer armor with its spiked knuckles wouldn’t make sense.
Can Logan cut Thor? Sure. But if it’s anything more than minimal superficial cuts, shit gets murky. A higher end Thor isn’t being cut by Logan in my opinion
And that's fine to have an opinion but the FACT is that Wolverine cuts through people with crazy durability ALL the time, with a number of them being at nor near Thor's level.
He's cut through the most durable versions of Hulk who has resisted Adamantium machines biting down on him.
And Hercules has displayed fear on two different occasions from them as well as being put down in a third.
Thor's been stabbed... a lot. Even in his reboot issue 1 he was taking superficial cuts from demon claws iirc.
Wolverine's claws are a better suited weapon to get the job done on cutting super durable beings. It's what the guy does, and if what he cut or could cut wasn't an absurdly impressive laundry list with names like Thanos on it, then it wouldn't be worth discussing in threads...
As it stands all your doing is engaging in the "I don't like it, it didn't happen" mentality.
Originally posted by Rage.Of.Olympus
baka
Seriously... How many? 😐
Originally posted by Rage.Of.Olympus
First of all, I’d like to point out that Thor doesn’t seem any more durable than his classic self unless his amping.His limb was hanging helplessly from the side? What the heck are you talking about.
No one’s arguing that Logan didn’t hurt Thor. I however did point out the idiotic leap in logic that he cut Thor to the point his arm was useless and such.
Did you call me a “naysaying jackhole”? Heh.
Don’t complain when I point out you’re idiotic leaps in logic or your mutant power to say so much, and yet mean or proof so little. It’s as an unnatural as your love for hairy midgets you cum cuzling son of a.....You get the idea.
Now that we’ve got insults out of the way I hope we can stick purely to debating. 🙂 If that’s within your capability of course.
If it makes you feel better or you believe it distracts people from your most likely poor points, you're free to throw in some insults in your next post. I don't care at all.
IMO his feats would be indicative of otherwise, but you may be right, maybe he was just stronger/more powerful... but it makes little sense that he wouldn't be more durable to me at least.
From all appearances, he DID cut Thor's arm to a point of uselessness.
Again, you want to believe that it's just a coincidence that Thor screamed out in pain when Wolverine appeared to cut through him, then couldn't be bothered to fend off Strange WITH THAT same arm while he opted to punch Wolverine with the other one, THEN had that arm limp at his side while grabbing it presumably in pain, THEN only used the good arm when he struggled to tear the necklace off, THEN lost that same arm in combat with Hulk and Thing?
And you think MY ARGUMENTS are weak or lacking proof? Or ME using "idiotic" leaps in logic? 🙄
What a joke.
I'd opt to insult you back, but the sheer stupidity of your assertion that Thor's arm wasn't injured to a high degree IN SPITE of what the panels would indicate does that job plenty enough for me.
BTW: what the **** is "cum cuzling"? 😐
In anycase I'd hardly think my addressing you as a "naysaying jackhole" (which was more of a sweeping generalization to the number of people who share ideals that you also have and not really specifically geared towards you) that big of a deal.. but I'm sorry if it hurt your feelings. You know I like you.
Originally posted by Rage.Of.Olympus
baka But they aren’t.
Which is fine except for the fact that a 616 example DOES exist supporting them in turn. They are just supporting evidence that back up the 616 proof we already have.
It's something that COULD/SHOULD/and likely does indicate Marvel's take on the nature of this discussion.
Originally posted by Rage.Of.Olympus
Like I said, I’m fine with Wolverine cutting Thor as long as the damage is at best minimal which it was except for one particular place.Don’t try and emphasize the armor. It means little. Trying to pretend otherwise is just opening yourself to ridicule.
Don't get me wrong. No one thinks Wolverine's going to de-limb Thor with ease, or slice through his bones like butter. But the fact of the matter is that he can likely do more than just superficial damage based on the things he's done seperate from this particular case, the things he's already did to Thor, as well as what Thor suggested/admitted to.
The armor IS an emphasis on the point we're discussing. Wolverine can cut through it to Thor's body to the point that Thor doubted his durability would hold out in a prolonged fight with Wolverine. It's not worth neglecting when someone such as yourself is trying to suggest Wolverine can't do more than superficial damage on Thor's skin alone.
Originally posted by Rage.Of.Olympus
Logan never caught him with a straight shot? Now you’re either lying or misremembering. It seems that the only thing you Wolverine fans call straight shots are shots that have Wolverine slicing and dicing his enemy.You’re getting pretty good at this. And by this, phrasing shit in a way to make Logan seem more impressive than he actually came off as.
Let’s not forget that this is arguably the lowest end Thor I’ve seen in a long time. I’ve seen Logan fans claim the scene was not relevant as it was not written by a good writer, the writer didn’t get the character, or all the number of b*tching, stretching, etc. done when Wolverine and/or characters related to him are in question.
Don’t even get me started on Wayverine. I’ve seen you –or Skrank- argue that since it wasn’t written by a competent writer, it’s not relevant. Then there’s the topic of whether Logan can get shot in the eye or not.
What did ODG call it again? Oh yea, Wolverithmetics.
No... by "straight shot", I mean a straight shot. Not a slice, not a dice, a straight jab that's meant to punch through one's opponent.
The bottem line is that Wolverine never landed a straight shot with his claws out because if he did we wouldn't be having this discussion.
A straight shot would have ended in one of two ways, either Wolverine stabbing through Thor, or his claws being jammed back into his arms.... unfortunately for your case, we already saw Wolverine cut Thor with slices and dices, and doing it through his armor, so the likelyhood that he couldn't flat out puncture Thor is a low one.
Yes, let's not forget this is a "low showing" for Thor based on your opinion...
Uh.... why is that again? Because he was outmaneuvered by Wolverine in close quarters combat? That's not a low showing, that's a likelyhood.
Because he was cut by Wolverine? That's not a low showing, that's a likelyhood.
Every Wolverine fan can tell you in a "real fight" Thor would obliterate Wolverine with the use of his powers, but in a melee, which is what most of that fight was, there was already a number of well thought out arguments for Wolverine with convincing proof long before that fight got put on panel... There's no need to act like Thor's out of Wolverine's league in melee given Wolverine's track record against Thor/Thor-like/Abc system opponents, and vice versa.
Now I'm not really sure what your issue is with my taking Thor's words at face value, but it was put down in black and white that Thor didn't think his durability was going to help him for long. I mean you can take up all the issue you want with that, but trying to pass it off like I'M the one misconstruing things here for some agenda is laughable at best.
Finally it wasn't my argument to throw out Ways writing on Wolverine, but there are more than enough reasons to hoever that's an entirely different discussion than the one we have right now as is the phantom bone theory, stop with the red herrings.