Originally posted by YFZ 350
I also noticed Cap had to take a few minutes to catch himself after his small plane crashed into the jungle tree's while Blade was up and ready to fight a ancient demon.
...
...
...
Are you daft?
Captain America was in small air craft. When that thing slammed into the ground their was no where for Captain America to go, there was nothing to absorb the force of the impact, Blade was inside a massive Helicarrier... are you really so stupid you don't know which you would be more likely to surivie? The fact that the air plane was small makes surviving the crash more impressive. And Captain America's plane crashed nose first into the ground, the Helicarrier came in on enough of an angle that it landed on it's bottom. They aren't even comparable feats, Captain America's is about a hundred times more impressive. It's like you are bragging to a guy who crashed his motorcycle into a wall at 120 mph and walked away that you survived a bus crash in a school zone.
Originally posted by YFZ 350
And comics aren't! My god one issue Wolverine can heal from a nuclear explosion and the next he's put down by a friggin werewolf.
Comics are primary cannon. Handbooks are meaningless nothing. Most people here on KMC have read enough of a character's appearances to have an understanding of how that character operates the majority of the time so they ignore the inconsistencies.
Originally posted by YFZ 350
That's why we have handbooks to sort this mess out.
Using a handbook is about as credible as saying "I have a t-shirt where it looks like Captain America is beating Blade." Handbooks are garbage and mean absolutely nothing. Fact. End of discussion. Comics are primary canon they override every thing else, nothing else even matters.
If you are basing your opinions on handbook entries then you aren't qualified to post in this thread.
Fine here another high end feat for Cap. No jungle no plane. A insane high fall.
Reed says Cap is traveling at 100 mph and he lands on the rocky thing and crashes on top of him. This is a very "high"end feat mind you.
http://img87.imageshack.us/my.php?image=strangetales160101zn8.jpg
http://img87.imageshack.us/my.php?image=strangetales161021pm3.jpg
No jungle no impressive hell carrier.
Originally posted by Dr.Crankenstein
By the way comparing feats is like using ABC logic. And well we all know how people feel about that....
HAHAHAHAHAHAAHA!
Good one.
That's like saying "we're debating this, so we'll ignore the actual FACTS about those involved."
Comparing feats is the ONLY way to get an accurate result, because it ignores the 'hypotheticals' and looks at what is actually canon.
Originally posted by YFZ 350
That's why we have handbooks to sort this mess out.
The same handbooks that for example, state that Nightwing is the 2nd best martial artist in the DC Universe? Even though in the actual canon, numerous characters have proved themselves better than him?
Basically you're saying we should ignore the actual facts and go by what "handbooks" say like they're some kind of sacred text, even when there's absolutely no proof to back them up?