Originally posted by carver9
My definition of durability is the ability to take punishment. when it comes to blunt force theres next to none that can withstand more punishment then the hulk due to his healing factor and his dense skin. I agree superman can take sharpnel better then hulk but when it comes to blunt force attacks hulk>>superman.
Exactly.
Its still a question of true durability.
Durability while a question of how resistant you are to physical damage, it is also how fast you repair and brush damage off. Hulk is both. One of the hardest to damage, and when it coming to healing is at least in Deadpool's range...which is insane.
For instance, If you remember when Superman and DD both died....what exactly was their reasons for dying? They had deep piercings, no broken bones, probably serious internal injuries, but absolutely not vital organs were missing.
I'll tell you. It was due to too much Physical Exhaustion, Physical Punishment, and Energy tap. All of which Savage Hulk has faced tons of times and never effected him. Which is why I laugh when people claim Superman's Durabilty>>>WWH. its silly.
Not only could Hulk survive such raw punishment, but all the while healing would only channel that pain towards his enemies. There is not question that WWH would own them both. You can claim that Superman could kill Hulk, but death by physical assault has NEVER been a threat to Hulk even facing far stronger opponents.
Hulk has never been Exhausted, the energy source that feeds his dynamic regen, durability,speed, an strength is inexhaustable. While possible to cut him off from this source, physical punishment wont stop it.
This is why he is the top brawler in comics and Hulk has never succumbed to this type of Physical Damage. If Superman or DD ever lost 90% of their flesh, they would obviously be DEAD. Hulk has, and regenerated it back in moments...which still advancing. You cannot beat Hulk to death, its impossible.