Originally posted by Joe_Fixit
It won't sink in. WWH spent a lot of time on Sakaar, and subsequently, gained a lot of fighting experience. Again, he would smash Supes in the ground easily.
Which he never showed during the WWH series... Is that sinking in, or do I have to say that Superman has a gamma nullifying power as well... Never showed it, but obviously he has it.
Originally posted by quanchi112
Point is Supes can be ko'd physically while we havent seen WW Hulk ko'd physically.A pretty significant point there cresh.
Actually its not a point so much as an ad ignorantiam fallacy. Its not so much a point as it is a violation of the rules of logic.
Originally posted by quanchi112
How many times do I have to post guys crushing Superman's face for this to sink in?
Which is a begging the question fallacy.
You'd also need to prove how the other person's strength compares to WWH inorder to prove your point. beyond that its a stolen concept fallacy as well.
Oh I know, how about if I show an 8 year old beating the hulk whom waded through the heroes that he fought in WWH? Would that sink in that an 8 year old could beat world war hulk?