Originally posted by h1a8
See how you are twisting up my argument? Guy was not only surprised but assessed DD's speed to be greater than Flash's. It's a big difference to say one is moving like (equal or in the vicinity of) Flash vs. one is moving faster than Flash. The latter implies that one knows what he is talking about. GLs, like SS, have traveled many lightyears in a mere moment. The crisis didn't affect them either. By your reasoning this should give them very good reflexes indeed.
I fail to see how or why I need to twist a poor argument. If I had a dollar for everytime A states that B hits the hardest/is the strongest/is the fastest etc, I would be substituting toilet rolls for hundred dollar bills. As entities who are nowhere near flash-level in terms of speed or reflex, I don't see why you are kicking up a fuss about someone calling shenanigans on your interpretation. Feel free to rebutt the points that I made previously.
Originally posted by h1a8 Your fallacy is the equating of strength. Guy wasn't equating speeds but inequating speeds (DD>>Flash). See the difference. Now if a human says that Colossus is stronger than Mangog then this implies that indeed Colossus is stronger (or has shown greater strength). But since Colossus isn't stronger, then a human wouldn't say that Colossus is stronger than Mangog but rather he is strong like Mangog. They could possibly say it though if Colossus has shown greater strength than Mangog, which in itself is something.
There isn't a difference because Guy is in no position whatsoever to comment on speeds. The fact that he says something absurd like Doomsday being faster than flash takes credence away from that statement, not otherwise.
My analogy had nothing to do with a human's perspective, but that of the third person omniscient. Read my analogy again before misinterpreting.
Originally posted by h1a8 I admit it was a folly to even argue the logic GL has great reflexes.
My argument is not strictly based off who said what but rather what was the writer's intention and the fact that a being (doesn't matter which one) used an inequality to compare.
The usage of an inequality is irrelevant due to the sheer absurdity of the statement. For a person who argued vehemently that WWH was not stronger than his previous incarnations despite on-panel labellings by other characters and writer intention (both of which are your criteria) simply because he did not BFR every opponent he faced, I wonder why you feel so at ease with claiming that Doomsday is flash-level when he got tagged plenty of times in DoS.
As to using a writer's intention, you are welcome to using them as your bible, as doomsday prophets are welcome to hold signs proclaiming impending doom. I'm welcome to not take it seriously either, for reasons previously stated.
Originally posted by h1a8 It is moot whether or not DD moves as fast as Flash since it is very reasonable that he will move faster than Cable can react. [/B]
This point is moot because the debate isn't about whether Cable can react to such speed.