but don't all the supreme beings get retcon, offically or not ?..i mean the beyonder was from the 80's on a whim of the editor/chief ( as a side is the editor/chief the boss of what is known as marvel?)..
who was supreme before him?...did he get retcon or just become irrevelant...Galactus appeared in the 60's...was he supreme being then? and if he was, what was the supreme being before he came?...and if they keep changing who/what the supreme being is..the title loses significance...
😱
Originally posted by Knowsbleed33
He was equal to TOAA within the Marvel omniverse.
What the HELL? Equal to the TOAA with in the marvel Omniverse? let's break down this statement.
He was equal to the one who created him.
He was equal to the one who created in within the marvel Omniverse( no where in secret wars is omniverse mentioned anywhere. No where does marvel say that the multiverse of old is the omniverse of today)
The One above all was never mentioned in Secret wars at all.
I must say that your statement is there for incorrect and untrue.
He was NOT equal to TOAA within the Marvel Omniverse!!!
Originally posted by King Kandy
He was equal to TOAA in the sense that they both would have had absolutely infinite and uncontested powers within the multiverse.BTW, I don't agree with the statement that he was in any sense equal to TOAA, just wanted to clarify it.
How can they both be uncontested. If he met the TOAA would you say that he would stalemate him?
Originally posted by fangirl101
How can they both be uncontested.
If he met the TOAA would you say that he would stalemate him?
it's a character withIN Marvel yes,
but it's a character that's portrayed
as the artist and the writer of everything that happens on panel,
therefore, no other drawing can contest against that.
This is why placing TOAA in a battle is an inconsequential, and self developed paradox,
it can't work out for said reasons.