...which was indeed posted, and accurately reflects my thoughts, but certainly isn't needed when Smurph's posting it just to incite controversy....or if he isn't, it sure as heck seems like it.
😬
Anyway, I co-sign what Bada said. Insults and accusations aren't justified in any circumstance. So leave it out of this thread, and others as well.
Originally posted by DigiMark007waiiiit a sec, didn't you yourself use the words "nvr" & "him" in both your write ups and oral presentation 😉
...which was indeed posted, and accurately reflects my thoughts, but certainly isn't needed when Smurph's posting it just to incite controversy....or if he isn't, it sure as heck seems like it.😬
Anyway, I co-sign what Bada said. Insults and accusations aren't justified in any circumstance. So leave it out of this thread, and others as well.
i by no means want to extend a bad joke or these "accusations" but c'mon digi.
Originally posted by psycho gundam
waiiiit a sec, didn't you yourself use the words "nvr" & "him" in both your write ups and oral presentation 😉i by no means want to extend a bad joke or these "accusations" but c'mon digi.
Originally posted by psycho gundam
waiiiit a sec, didn't you yourself use the words "nvr" & "him" in both your write ups and oral presentation 😉i by no means want to extend a bad joke or these "accusations" but c'mon digi.
Not to my recollection, no. As for calling fangirl a "him," if I did it at all, it wasn't deliberate. I've called charlotte "him" accidentally too. I wouldn't read too much into it.
And the point stands that people treat fangirl like sh*t because they view him/her as a sock. We're entitled to our opinions, but not to breaking the rules of conduct on the forums.
Originally posted by DigiMark007Thank goodness for the constition of KMC. We are all equal under the code of conduct rules.
Not to my recollection, no. As for calling fangirl a "him," if I did it at all, it wasn't deliberate. I've called charlotte "him" accidentally too. I wouldn't read too much into it.And the point stands that people treat fangirl like sh*t because they view him/her as a sock. We're entitled to our opinions, but not to breaking the rules of conduct on the forums.
Originally posted by psycho gundam
i want to point out the numerous amounts of available evidence to prove that fg and the perma-banned nvr are one and the same....... but i can ironically get banned for it. 🙄 😉anyway, innuendo, double entendres, and subliminal shots are fare game
😖mart:
Originally posted by psycho gundamWell, you are definitely warned. Breaking rules is not acceptable, especially after a polite request to stop.
but i can ironically get banned for it. 🙄 😉
Originally posted by psycho gundamNo, it's not fair game. It's actually bashing and flaming.
anyway, innuendo, double entendres, and subliminal shots are fare game
Originally posted by psycho gundamdursmart is more accurate.
😖mart:
Stay off this thread with your spam and flaming please. Anymore and it will result in warnings or more. Thanks.
Originally posted by Badabing
Well, you are definitely warned. Breaking rules is not acceptable, especially after a polite request to stop.No, it's not fair game. It's actually bashing and flaming.
dursmart is more accurate.
Stay off this thread with your spam and flaming please. Anymore and it will result in ore warnings or more. Thanks.