Delph's League of Champions Season One Discussion Thread

Originally posted by DigiMark007
FG, stop anyway. Nobody likes odd internet flirting.

But I co-sign Bada.

And thanks for the update ill. I'll hold off on the writeup.

Originally posted by illadelph12
Judge votes are delayed. We'll likely have a one day postponement to sort things out.

Originally posted by psycho gundam
subliminal shots are fare game

Anyways, I think Blair and I are deciding to stay in the game... in which case, the 1-day postponement is good, because I'll have to redraft tonight, and I doubt Fangirl would appreciate it if the match started tomorrow.

And lulz @ the mod/nvr/fangirl debacle.

Debacle indeed. And yeah, you would need to redraft for Sand.

I assume the same rule applies as when Scoob/leo were allowed to re-draft for Cortez. They couldn't rework their entire team, just replace the lone illegal part.

Originally posted by Cavalier
Shots that go slower than the speed of light?

Originally posted by psycho gundam
no, that's "sub luminal". subliminal shots are shots that go faster than the speed of thought 😎

Below the form of perception action.

Originally posted by psycho gundam
no, that's "sub luminal". subliminal shots are shots that go faster than the speed of thought 😎

that's because mine was a subliminal one, it will sink in latter. 😛

Originally posted by psycho gundam
that's because mine was a subliminal one, it will sink in latter. 😛

Permission to use that excuse next time I post bullshit?

Originally posted by Cavalier
heh.

Permission to use that excuse next time I post bullshit?

please, like you need an excuse . . . heh

Originally posted by psycho gundam
subliminal shots are shots that go faster than the speed of thought

Speed of thought is relative, after all.

😐

Originally posted by leonidas
😐

Just wait for your speed of thought to catch up.

😊

nutkick

which match are we waiting on, or are we waiting on all 3? can you post the results you have and get ANY of this week's matches ready to go for tomorrow? the longer the judges delay, the further back the matches have to go. whether certain strategies were accepted or not (as digi said) is important when doing and planning write-ups . . .

I'll co-sign leo, dramatic as it is to have all votes unveiled at once. I think one of the judges had to pull out, so we may only have 2 votes for each match, but meh.

And if worse comes to worse, we can take a collective bye week or something.

Originally posted by DigiMark007
I'll co-sign leo, dramatic as it is to have all votes unveiled at once. I think one of the judges had to pull out, so we may only have 2 votes for each match, but meh.

And if worse comes to worse, we can take a collective bye week or something.

Originally posted by fangirl101
If one of the judges had pull out, we can have the team on bye week provide the judgement. Someone like me who isn't anywhere near making the tourney for say wouldn't have any reason to vote unfairly since the scores don't matter to me.

Nope, I'm against anyone participating in the tourney judging any of the matches.

Originally posted by Scoobless
Nope, I'm against anyone participating in the tourney judging any of the matches.

Yeah, I'm against that too. Not going to the playoffs or not, there's too much pre-determined bias in your opinions based off of your earlier matches against us. It's not that I wouldn't trust a participant to be fair, it's that everyone forms opinions that favor their own tactics in tourneys, and similarly against tactics that other teams try. It's a necessity of debate....it helps if we believe what we write. So the notion of an unbiased outsider goes out the window, regardless of how sincere the person is that they will remain fair.