Originally posted by DigiMark007Not for you it isn't. But for me yes. 💃 💃 💃
This is a tourney thread. Choke back the fake internet emotion and take it to the GDF or off-topic thread or something. I was for him too (rooting for him, that is...my ballot was for Bob Barr), but it's nothing to cry about.
I haven't had a chance to contact Goob since the weekend. I'll likely cover for him on the judgments. I'm a bit busy here at work myself so it likely won't be until around 1p my time today.
As for the matches which were scheduled to begin on Monday, they will be posted on Monday, November 10th. This will give people ample time to adjust their plans based on the judgments (as/if necessary) posted today.
more than a week now for people to have read these matches. this is what bogs down and drains tournies more than anything. can we move to some form of judge-by-volunteer? ask for 3 volunteers who will read the matches instead of assigning judges. if we don't get 3 volunteers a couple days before the matches start, THEN assign. i don't really care WHO acts as judge--any newbie can read and decide on merits of logic and it might generate interest as well.
this judging issue is really sucking the life and interest out of this the last couple weeks.