Originally posted by Silent Master
WTF does that have to do with anything, since it's clearly not what was used in 24. Are you just desperately googling "thunder tasers"? LOL 😆
Originally posted by Lestov16
LOL. No end to your butthurt downplay (referring to Robtard here; Saddie's opinion means less than a Zimbabwean dust mite and doesn't really deserve anyone's attention)
Says the boywonder of butthurt who has utterly lost all argument:
"Nooooosssss!!!! Don't listen to those cowwect peeeples.....Wahhhhhhhhh" etc
Originally posted by Lestov16
Some more butthurt words from the butthurt boi. Just don't go spamming other threads please, like you've been doing. It makes you look like a pathetic sap 😆
Some more butthurt words from the butthurt boi. Just don't go spamming other threads please, like you've been doing. It makes you look like a pathetic sap 😆
Seriously, you derailed this social thread with you McButthurt. Then accuse me of spamming in one thread because I mention that. Shame on you.
Originally posted by Silent Master
Follow the link, there are several SK Thunder models that have a label on them...there goes your argument.
Please post the pictures. And I hope these labels you are talking about don't just have the model number on them, because it's obviously not the same thing.
If so,...there goes your argument.
Originally posted by Lestov16
Please post the pictures. And I hope these labels you are talking about don't just have the model number on them, because it's obviously not the same thing.If so,...there goes your argument.
Says the guy that doesn't post the requested picture, nor does he post a picture that shows both sides of the stun gun to verify that there is no label.....you have zero credibility.
Originally posted by BruceSkywalker
is this stuff funnier than classic richard pryor???
The boys at the labs are running tests as we speak...
YouTube video
Originally posted by Silent Master
Says the guy that doesn't post the requested picture, nor does he post a picture that shows both sides of the stun gun to verify that there is no label.....you have zero credibility.
Again a picture of the SK Thunder XL is not on the internet. That's a real dick move trying to get me to present evidence that both you and I know doesn't exist. Says a lot about how spiteful you are, especially since it's very clear I took the next best option.
And I did post both sides of the stun gun used on Bauer, meaning you're blind, retarded, or both if you didn't see the big pictures posted.
LOL, I proved my point absolutely. And you're dancing now since you can't prove yours, since, lemme guess, those tasers had model numbers on their labels. You're the one with no credibility since I crushed your butthurt argument. Pathetic, kid. Try better next time 😆
Originally posted by Lestov16
LOL. No end to your butthurt downplay (referring to Robtard here; Saddie's opinion means less than a Zimbabwean dust mite and doesn't really deserve anyone's attention)
By your own words it's a Thunder XL, which is rated at "100,000 volts" and by all appearances, it's one of those cheap lady-tasers. So point that butthurt pendulum back your way, cos it's certainly not me who is.
Also, a google image search of "Thunder XL SK8000" nets this:
Which looks very much like the one in 24. Cheap lady-taser, better used as a bludgeoning device than a taser.
Originally posted by Lestov16
Again a picture of the SK Thunder XL is not on the internet. That's a real dick move trying to get me to present evidence that both you and I know doesn't exist. Says a lot about how spiteful you are, especially since it's very clear I took the next best option.And I [b]did
post both sides of the stun gun used on Bauer, meaning you're blind, retarded, or both if you didn't see the big pictures posted.LOL, I proved my point absolutely. And you're dancing now since you can't prove yours, since, lemme guess, those tasers had model numbers on their labels. You're the one with no credibility since I crushed your butthurt argument. Pathetic, kid. Try better next time 😆 [/B]
If there is no pic online, how can you claim that it doesn't have a label?
If said evidence doesn't exist, then its real lame of you to assert a notion based on it, Lestov.
And THIS:
Originally posted by Robtard
By your own words it's a Thunder XL, which is rated at "100,000 volts" and by all appearances, it's one of those cheap lady-tasers. So point that butthurt pendulum back your way, cos it's certainly not me who is.Also, a google image search of "Thunder XL SK8000" nets this:
Which looks exactly like the one in 24.