Off Topic Circle Jerk

Originally posted by Sadako of Girth
No. But you whack off on it though, breaking that bed brazenly bashing the bishop over Bauer, by all accounts.

LOL, hypocrite's trying to accuse me of fanboyism when his dumbass makes regular comments like

Originally posted by Lestov16
you said McClane had a shot against Jason Bourne 😆

Originally posted by Sadako of Girth

McClane probably does

😆 Get off my jock, child. You can't handle this.

Lestov: -9

Everyone else: 8 (on it's side)

Bauer wouldn't even have made it past the 1st seasons without constant, full on team help, left, right, center, above and below.

Cry more, Liz. 🙂

I found a pic of the Thunder XL stun gun online, looks like lestov was lying.

Originally posted by Silent Master
If there is no pic online, how can you claim that it doesn't have a label?

Because every tazer in the SK Thunder series has a thunderbolt logo, and the one from 24 does not. It's common sense, or is this logic just too complex for you to handle?

Originally posted by Robtard
By your own words it's a Thunder XL, which is rated at "100,000 volts" and by all appearances, it's one of those cheap lady-tasers. So point that butthurt pendulum back your way, cos it's certainly not me who is.

Also, a google image search of "Thunder XL SK8000" nets this:

Which looks very much like the one in 24. Cheap lady-taser, better used as a bludgeoning device than a taser.

Thanks, because that clearly is not the one from 24, as can be immediately discerned by the label. So you've pretty much proven that the SK thunder XL is not the same as the fictional one seen in 24.

Robtard: Proving people's points for them since the 1960s 🙂

Originally posted by Silent Master
I found a pic of the Thunder XL stun gun online, looks like lestov was lying.

Yes his 'current' form is both 'shocking' and 'stunning', with all that over 'amp'ing of Bauer. 😖hifty:

Originally posted by Silent Master
I found a pic of the Thunder XL stun gun online, looks like lestov was lying.

Looks like you're lying until you post the picture, which is what you should have done in the first place (if you have it).

Originally posted by Sadako of Girth
What a surrrrppprrrrrrrrriiiiiiiiiiiiiiiisssse..... 😖hifty:

Oh yea. I always get Robtard to prove my points for me after kicking his ass in an argument. Happens virtually 24/7

Originally posted by Lestov16
Looks like you're lying until you post the picture, which is what you should have done in the first place (if you have it).

Oh yea. I always get Robtard to prove my points for me after kicking his ass in an argument. Happens virtually 24/7

Here you go

Originally posted by Lestov16

Thanks, because that [b]clearly is not the one from 24, as can be immediately discerned by the label. So you've pretty much proven that the SK thunder XL is not the same as the fictional one seen in 24.

Robtard: Proving people's points for them since the 1960s 🙂 [/B]

Yet it clearly looks practically identical barring a label difference. The shape, size, color etc, all the same.

We all know that two identical items can't have different labels, this NEVER happens 🙂

Both Mercedes spec 226.10 transmission fluid for the 722.6 MBZ 5-speed transmission, the only difference is the label and the price. I know, cos I own a car that has that transmission.

But again, it's for you to prove that the Thunder SK used in 24 is different than the other Thunder SKs shown and that it is somehow a 'super taser' instead of the cheap lady-taser it appears to be. Proceed 🙂

Wow Lestie...you really made it huh? Your balls resting peacefully on your chin..?

You lose, don't get mad at US.

Originally posted by Silent Master
Here you go

Game. Set. And Match.

Well, thats Lestov finished.....

*Goes back to newspaper and cup of tea*

Originally posted by Robtard
Yet it clearly looks practically identical barring a label difference. The shape, size, color etc, all the same.

We all know that two identical items can't have different labels, this NEVER happens 🙂

Exactly. 😉

Clearly the 2003 can is far deadlier than the current one.

Terrifyingly so. 😛

330ml of pure pantshittingly potent and brutal power.

Originally posted by Robtard
Yet it clearly looks practically identical barring a label difference. The shape, size, color etc, all the same.

That's an SK label in the Bauer picture? Can you prove that?

Originally posted by Robtard
We all know that two identical items can't have different labels, this NEVER happens 🙂

Again, if you can prove that it's an SK label in the Bauer picture, you win.

Originally posted by Robtard
Both Mercedes spec 226.10 transmission fluid for the 722.6 MBZ 5-speed transmission, the only difference is the label and the price. I know, cos I own a car that has that transmission.

How does this prove that it's an SK label in the Bauer picture?

Originally posted by Robtard
But again, it's for you to prove that the Thunder SK used in 24 is different than the other Thunder SKs shown

I never said it was a Thunder SK in 24. I said it was a Thunder XL. And It's different from SK Thunder tazers because it doesn't have the thunderbolt logo.

Originally posted by Robtard
and that it is somehow a 'super taser' instead of the cheap lady-taser it appears to be. Proceed 🙂

Well, it killed a man who withstood 20 months of this:
YouTube video

As stated before, Thunder XL>>>...Chinese electric torture
Chinese electric torture>>>...regular tazer
Thunder XL>>>>>>.....regular tazer

That's really the only possible way to determine it's power.

Prove it is the "cheap lady-taser" you say it is. Proceed.

Originally posted by Silent Master
Here you go

Umm......Why did you repost Rob's picture? Any point to it other than pathetic trolling? 😕

Stop being butthurt, Silent Master. You don't want to be a moronic idiot like Sadako, do you?

If you're claiming that the label is for a different brand of stun guns, by all means post pics of these mythical stun guns.

It's for a fictional brand, as I've already stated (and which also explains it's unnatural power). If the label is for SK Thunder brand, then by all means post pics of these SK Thunder labels, since you claim the one in 24 is of that brand.

This guy and his antics. You said it's a Thunder XL. I found the Thunder XL online, it's full name in the Korean site that sells it for $42.95 is the 'Thunder XL sk8000'. It looks virtually identical to the "Thunder XL" seen in 24, barring a minor label difference.

As proven, same items can have different labels.

So, considering what we see on 24 is named "Thunder XL" and is identical to the Thunder XL I linked to in size, shape, color and layout, it's for you to prove that it's some super-taser as per your claim and not the lady-taser it appears to be. Go.

Originally posted by Lestov16
It's for a fictional brand, as I've already stated (and which also explains it's unnatural power). If the label is for SK Thunder brand, then by all means post pics of these SK Thunder labels, since you claim the one in 24 is of that brand.

Thunder XL isn't a fictional brand, try again.

So I've proved it's not SK brand because it's not the SK label or thunderbolt logo, and you can't prove otherwise because it's obviously not SK brand and there is no SK label that looks like that. So that's another argument you lost 😂

Keep dancing, monkey boi 😆

Originally posted by Lestov16
So I've proved it's not SK brand because it's not the SK label or thunderbolt logo, and you can't prove otherwise because it's [b]obviously not SK brand and there is no SK label that looks like that. So that's another argument you lost 😂

Keep dancing, monkey boi 😆 [/B]

Incorrect, you have provided zero proof that the Sk Thunder XL doesn't have a label.