Originally posted by chillmeistergen
Drunk?
You got two letters correct and you added an extra.
Wow! Big Sarah Palin sex scandal incomming!
Originally posted by Darth Jellodo you really think the fact that our most recent presidents were left-handed translates into a conscious decision by the voters?
There is one unfortunate statistical fact that may win mccain the election. Americans love voting for lefty candidates. Maybe Obama should start inverting photos and videos of himself writing?
Originally posted by KidRock
I think I would have voted ron paul if he ran as an independent.
You'd have voted Ron Paul? If he were running as an independant? ****ing loser. He was running as a republican! You should have voted for him before that. Sadly, your vote would have represented an overwhelming misunderstanding of reality. I agree with Dr. Paul on the war; I agre with Mr. Paul when it comes to the economy. But I, personally, think the rest of the ticket should be considered, seriously. Pay an ounce of attention to what he says coupled with what Mr. Paul preaches. Even Mr. Rock would be appaled.
Originally posted by Devil King
You'd have voted Ron Paul? If he were running as an independant? ****ing loser. He was running as a republican! You should have voted for him before that. Sadly, your vote would have represented an overwhelming misunderstanding of reality. I agree with Dr. Paul on the war; I agre with Mr. Paul when it comes to the economy. But I, personally, think the rest of the ticket should be considered, seriously. Pay an ounce of attention to what he says coupled with what Mr. Paul preaches. Even Mr. Rock would be appaled.
I don't find my self at odds with Dr. Paul's political stances. I'm not for with drawing from the UN or NATO...but I'm pretty much in agreement with the other items.
I agree with his nonintervention, thoroughly.
If you want a "maaaaaahverick", look no further than Ron Paul. Sorry, McCain.
How come people aren't singing his praises for his comments on the impending economic crisis due to the devaluation of the dollar?
Yes, get rid of the federal reserve, DEA, etc. Income taxes? Who neds them. Foreign country occupancy? Bring 'em back.
Originally posted by KidRock
Those are 2 pretty big things.
That's what she said.
Both candidates will essentially be and do the same thing economically speaking, when either one becomes president. Both'll spend bathtub loads of your tax dollars unnecessarily even though they're sayin' they're not gonna.
They'll each just do it differently.
One'll use it to fund unnecessary wars the other'll fund unnecessary social programs.
But whomever the new president will be, he'll either make us or break us, greatl, with no inbetween. Thing is, that new president'll have inherit this mess. We so he'd (we'd) already be at a disadvantage.
God, i hope everything works out. This country needs a miracle. And a true leader. And right now i don't see it in either. but i hope whomever's picked really delivers. Cause that's what's needed. Not a regular president, but a kickass, no holds bar, non-BS U.S. president. Anything less will not work.
Originally posted by FistOfThe NorthSocial problems aren't unnecessary. They surely helped the UK in 1948.
Both candidates will essentially be and do the same thing economically speaking, when either one becomes president. Both'll spend bathtub loads of your tax dollars unnecessarily even though they're sayin' they're not gonna.They'll each just do it differently.
One'll use it to fund unnecessary wars the other'll fund unnecessary social programs.
But whomever the new president will be, he'll either make us or break us, greatl, with no inbetween. Thing is, that new president'll have inherit this mess. We so he'd (we'd) already be at a disadvantage.
God, i hope everything works out. This country needs a miracle. And a true leader. And right now i don't see it in either. but i hope whomever's picked really delivers. Cause that's what's needed. Not a regular president, but a kickass, no holds bar, non-BS U.S. president. Anything less will not work.
Originally posted by FistOfThe North
Both candidates will essentially be and do the same thing economically speaking,
No.
Originally posted by FistOfThe North
Both'll spend bathtub loads of your tax dollars unnecessarily even though they're sayin' they're not gonna.
Possibly. 😄
Originally posted by FistOfThe North
They'll each just do it differently.
Contradiction, virtually, to your first statement.
Originally posted by FistOfThe North
One'll use it to fund unnecessary wars the other'll fund unnecessary social programs.
Possibly...but I leaning towards less spending from Obama. The lesser of the two evils.
Originally posted by FistOfThe North
God, i hope everything works out. This country needs a miracle. And a true leader. And right now i don't see it in either. but i hope whomever's picked really delivers. Cause that's what's needed. Not a regular president, but a kickass, no holds bar, non-BS U.S. president. Anything less will not work.
Are you a registered voter? If you are, then you're voting for Obama, right? There's no way you'd vote for an old school hite guy, right?
I'm serious about this.