searching for a wife on yahoo

any takers?

http://blog.360.yahoo.com/blog-.qtJYXA8eqhltjrW6Xuq.KvKoh4OE6UF

my favorite excerpt

When A Wife Becomes a Whore

God has made it clear, one of the purposes for marriage is for the prevention of sin, namely promiscuous sex, adultery. God gives clear instructions that when it comes to sex, the woman has no authority over her body, and the man has no authority over his body, that is, your partner has absolute authority over your body. Generally, men do not have a problem with this. God also makes it clear that the only reason you can separate sexually, is for the purpose of worshiping God Himself and only when both partners agree to the separation and only for a short specified amount of time. In other words, unless both husband and wife agree for a short specific amount of time to separate for the explicit purpose of worshiping God, neither have authority to withhold them self sexually from their partner. Now, lets clear up a little matter, this absolute authority your spouse has over you sexually is not just physically, it is also all your sexual passion. When your spouse wants you sexually, you are to give him not just your body, but your whole being and passion. You are to love your spouse sexually with all your body, mind, and sole, in other words, with all your passion. Anything less in not full submission and is a breach of your marriage contract automatically invoked when marriage occurs.

The transition into whoredom:

At the beginning of marriage, the above is usually never a problem. And generally never becomes a problem for the man to fulfill. But, as time goes on, the wife starts using her sexual favors as a tool to manipulate the man into giving her what she wants or doing what she wants. First, this shows that the wife is becoming less submissive and more disobedient. But the bottom line is, when the wife demands payment, whether in the form of things (getting her what she wants) or actions (do this or that for her), she has become a whore. She is now being paid for sexual favors. And eventually, the wife's payment for her sexual favors become so costly and/or constant, that the husband, being wise in his spending, starts looking for a less expensive whore, or another woman who has not yet turned into a whore. Of course, when the husband does this, has becomes unfaithful, but, and this is a big but, God makes it clear that when you sin against God, which is what the wife who turns into a whore does, God makes the whore of a wife responsible for causing her husband to stumble. Wives who have become whores are under the unmistaken belief that they share no culpability for their husband's unfaithfulness. It was the wife's unfaithfulness to her husband, by breach of contract, that was the catalyst for her husband's unfaithfulness, and God holds her more accountable than He holds her husband, who has unconditional and unrestricted right to her sexually.

You my friend have leaned on your own understanding, and in turn got it wrong. The bible says that you should "not" have sex with your spouse to the point of saturation, you should meditate on the lord more than you are given to have sex.... why? Because you defile your relationship with not just your spouse, but with God as well, and in doing so you open the door for lust to creep into your beautiful camp, sometimes abstinence is the best policy even in marriage. When the doorway to lust is opened in your relationship, oftentimes it lures strangers into it as well.

Going off topic a little... most women are the more sexual of the two, and not to seem sexist, but it is the mans job to get control of himself, and not give in to the temptation of sleeping with is wife seven days per week.... men should try their best to go without, and will therefore be more appreciated, because a woman can say that she wants to have sex, but often when she gets what she wants... well let's just say that the thrill is gone.

You should reread the bible and if you are confused about something, you should bring it up with someone that knows better.

The bible also clearly states that a whore can be both a man or a women.... it says that a whore is a person that has left their first estate for the notion of something better. This could also be an organization IE a church that has fallen away from it's first love, for the notion or idea of something better this is what the bible considers to be a whore.

Choose your words carefully, because sometimes ignorance is not bliss.

I can see why his ex divorced him.

haha..that's brilliant...i like how he's all prim and proper until the bit about bondage and sadomasichism

HO HO HO

🙄

That first part is right about giving yourselves to each other and not withholding out of spite or to accomplish something.

But the second part is horsecrap. The bible is clear in many places that a man shouldn't have an affair/commit adultery. If he does, it's sin and his fault. "Beware the adulterous woman, do not go into her house. That way leads to death." (paraprahsed)

The guy who wrote that little rant has no game. 😛

Originally posted by sithsaber408
🙄

That first part is right about giving yourselves to each other and not withholding out of spite or to accomplish something.

But the second part is horsecrap. The bible is clear in many places that a man shouldn't have an affair/commit adultery. If he does, it's sin and his fault. "Beware the adulterous woman, do not go into her house. That way leads to death." (paraprahsed)

The guy who wrote that little rant has no game. 😛

You realize...the impact church is a schismatic sect and in a grave state of sin?

Originally posted by sithsaber408
🙄

That first part is right about giving yourselves to each other and not withholding out of spite or to accomplish something.

I'm sorry....

you are of the opinion that a woman who is not interested in sex MUST give herself to her husband if he wants it?

Originally posted by inimalist
I'm sorry....

you are of the opinion that a woman who is not interested in sex MUST give herself to her husband if he wants it?

For any Christian, they should see rape as spitting in the face of God.

Originally posted by Grand_Moff_Gav
For any Christian, they should see rape as spitting in the face of God.

I'd hope so, hence why I asked for clarification before asserting he was proposing institutional rape

Originally posted by inimalist
I'm sorry....

you are of the opinion that a woman who is not interested in sex MUST give herself to her husband if he wants it?

That wouldn't be out of spite. That would be a genuine, "I'm really just not in the mood" and so it wouldn't fall inside what he was suggesting.

Originally posted by inimalist
I'm sorry....

you are of the opinion that a woman who is not interested in sex MUST give herself to her husband if he wants it?

Yeah. And vice-versa.

It's a whole concept about being "one flesh" that isn't apparent in secular marriages.

Your finances, your home, your descisions, your bodies,...you are one. You don't have ownership over yourself anymore, you joined with another person. (and they don't have ownership overthemselves anymore)

Note: if the woman is sick or tired or has a headache or whatever, that's understandable. I'm not talking about that.

But if she's good, and he's good, and he wants to have sex, it's her place to do it.

Same thing, if the guy came home from a long day at work and is tired and the wife wants it (or maybe oral sex, something that women love as well)...well, the guy better get himself cleaned up and ready to go.

Unless, as stated by the first posters quote, it's mutually agreed upon for a time to get closer to God.

Originally posted by Grand_Moff_Gav
You realize...the impact church is a schismatic sect and in a grave state of sin?

We believe in the Bible, in God the Father and Creator, in Jesus His Son the saviour, and in the Holy Spirit. Everything we believe comes straight from scripture.

Probably a convo for PM or the religion forum, but why do you say that?

Originally posted by sithsaber408
O Rly?

We believe in the Bible, in God the Father and Creator, in Jesus His Son the saviour, and in the Holy Spirit. Everything we believe comes straight from scripture.

Probably a convo for PM or the religion forum, but why do you say that?

Just to wind you up, anyway giving lip service is one thing...

Originally posted by Symmetric Chaos
That wouldn't be out of spite. That would be a genuine, "I'm really just not in the mood" and so it wouldn't fall inside what he was suggesting.

that doesn't come through very clearly in this:

God has made it clear, one of the purposes for marriage is for the prevention of sin, namely promiscuous sex, adultery. God gives clear instructions that when it comes to sex, the woman has no authority over her body, and the man has no authority over his body, that is, your partner has absolute authority over your body. Generally, men do not have a problem with this. In other words, unless both husband and wife agree for a short specific amount of time to separate for the explicit purpose of worshiping God, neither have authority to withhold them self sexually from their partner. Now, lets clear up a little matter, this absolute authority your spouse has over you sexually is not just physically, it is also all your sexual passion. When your spouse wants you sexually, you are to give him not just your body, but your whole being and passion. You are to love your spouse sexually with all your body, mind, and sole, in other words, with all your passion. Anything less in not full submission and is a breach of your marriage contract automatically invoked when marriage occurs.

I guess sith does just refer to spite, though he does say this part is correct. again, why I asked for a clarification before saying he is proposing rape

Originally posted by sithsaber408
But if she's good, and he's good, and he wants to have sex, it's her place to do it.

so, if the only reason a woman has for not wanting sex is that she, lets say, is pissed of at her husband and doesn't want to out of spite, she HAS to?

Originally posted by inimalist
that doesn't come through very clearly in this:

I guess sith does just refer to spite, though he does say this part is correct. again, why I asked for a clarification before saying he is proposing rape

Well, yes and no.

I'm referring to spite, but to me it's spite if the woman is feeling okay (not sick or headache or anything), has nothing pressing to do and is just hanging around the house that night, and the husband wants to have sex and she says no.

She needs to GET herself in the mood. It's part of being a wife.

Note: it is the wise husband who is romantic enough to make dinner, bring flowers, give a massage or a bath, engage in foreplay, etc... to make his wife more open to having sex.

But even if he doesn't, if she can and won't, that's spite.

Originally posted by inimalist
that doesn't come through very clearly in this:

Yeah that's pretty damned creepy. However, I would point it seems to be a result of that manner of "marriage contract" not a general rule for interaction between men a women (voluntary contracts like that do exist, many of them even more explicitly in favor of one side). But it's possible I'm looking for positive in what's written there, if it supposed to mean that a woman (or man) must be totally subservient in order to be a good spouse it's pretty sick.

Originally posted by sithsaber408
Yeah. And vice-versa.

It's a whole concept about being "one flesh" that isn't apparent in secular marriages.

Your finances, your home, your descisions, your bodies,...you are one. You don't have ownership over yourself anymore, you joined with another person. (and they don't have ownership overthemselves anymore)

Note: if the woman is sick or tired or has a headache or whatever, that's understandable. I'm not talking about that.

But if she's good, and he's good, and he wants to have sex, it's her place to do it.

Same thing, if the guy came home from a long day at work and is tired and the wife wants it (or maybe oral sex, something that women love as well)...well, the guy better get himself cleaned up and ready to go.

Unless, as stated by the first posters quote, it's mutually agreed upon for a time to get closer to God.

Ridiculous. Why is only the desire to have sex, but not the wish not to have it at the time to be considered under your idiotic rules?

Did you somehow not think that one through at all?

What if your wife wanted to shit in your mouth, but you didn't. Whose "want" wins? And why? Randomly, or does God have exact rules written down somewhere.

****, you fundies are so delusionally insane and stupid, I can't get over it.

Originally posted by inimalist
I'd hope so, hence why I asked for clarification before asserting he was proposing institutional rape

I would think, in terms of Christian theology, that Rape should be seen as one of the worse forms of assault. In the sense that it totally ignores rules on marriage and defies the apparent design of male/female unity...

Originally posted by sithsaber408
She needs to GET herself in the mood. It's part of being a wife.

so, does this qualify as proof of the emancipation of women by religious dogma?