Spoiler Warning: Sidious fanboys, have tissues standing by for Palpatine's final demise.
Debunking the DE Sidious Myth
Premise: Contrary to popular opinion, the Dark Empire incarnation of Darth Sidious is not the most powerful version of Palpatine's character. Specifically, he is less proficient in combat than other incarnations.
Evidentiary Support: I'm going to do this part in sections, given the vast amount of evidence present. We shall start first with the fairly obvious.
1) The Emperor's clone bodies were weaker than his original body. Why? They were unable to handle the amount of energy that Palpatine was channeling from the Dark Side, and decayed at a much faster rate than Palpatine's original body. Despite him having at the very most six years between Return of the Jedi and Dark Empire, Palpatine's body looks as old and ravaged in DE as he does in ROTJ. He looks similar in The Force Unleashed, which takes place six years before ROTJ, as well. This means that Sidious' body aged as much in six years as he had in roughly 70 years of Dark Side training with his original body (I will touch on the number soon). Support for Palpatine's body ravaging quicker in his clones than the original?
Because of imperfections in the cloning process, the new vessel was more vulnerable to the depredations of the Dark Side. As a result, the Emperor's body would age even more rapidly than the old, becoming corrupted and useless in a few short years.
"Age and physical decay hastened their pace, and his body collapsed, like a world oppressed."
I know, you have to be saying, "But Enyalus, decaying might not mean getting weaker. Do you have proof?" Without explicitly saying the exact words, yes -
"Palpatine's own clone bodies were getting further and further away from the original, and thus they were decaying faster and faster."
"Oh, but Enyalus, that's only said once. Doesn't mean much." So, let's have more evidence, saying the same thing!
"...his current clone, so far from the original, was decaying at an advanced rate. He needed fresh genetic stock, strong in the Force, with which he could create a new, endless source of clones."
And why, praytell, must he need other genetic resources that are strong in the Force for? We should keep in mind that Dark Empire was written in 1991, which is 8 years before The Phantom Menace came out and explained to us all about Force connections and the midi-chlorians. Taken from Jedi vs. Sith, we learn that the magnitude of the midichlorian count served as a measure of one's Force potential. That Palpatine's clone were less able to handle the energies that he was channeling, decaying faster than his natural body as a result, is circumstantial proof that the clones possessed fewer midi-chlorians than the original host. Ergo, his search for genetic stock naturally strong in the Force (i.e., high Force potential/large midi-chlorian count).
"[Palpatine] kidnapped the best of the Ysanna [humanoids native to Ossus who were naturally Force-sensitive] as genetic stock for a new line of clones."
That each successive clone decayed faster than the last - meaning lower midi-chlorian count - suggests that after each of Palpatine's deaths, his power would actually decrease. While it is true that he might have had more time to learn Force techniques, study holocrons, and gain knowledge of the Force, his overall and sheer Force potential would diminish. This brings me to my second point.
2) Dark Empire was not the first clone Palpatine inhabited, nor was it the first time he had died. To my knowledge, this has never been acknowledged by members of KMC. It is a huge point, and the reason I brought up TFU and his age in point #1. Evidence? Once Luke confronts the Emperor for the first time in DE, he is shocked. And referencing Return of the Jedi, the conversation goes:
Luke - "But I saw you die!"
Sidious - "It was not the first time I died...nor will it be the last."
Sidious - "For many years I have been under a dire necessity. My body has decayed again and again...and each time I have needed to take another."
Thus it is clear that the Darth Sidious shown in ROTJ was also a clone, and that the original Palpatine had died some time before. As point #1 established, clones decay faster and are weaker due to their genetic impurities than Sidious' original body.
I would like to present outside evidence now, to further my case. When TFN.net was asked who was the strongest Sith ever, their official response was: "Palpatine at his peak." Which begs the question, "What was his peak?" It couldn't have been DE, because he is already in his third clone body by the sixth issue - and ROTJ Sidious was also a clone, diminishing his natural power there. It is up to us, then, to determine as accurately and as safely as possible - without prejudice - when exactly is Palpatine at his peak.
We know from DE that Palpatine only realizes the secret to cheating death through the means of clone bodies via the Tedryn Holocron, which he receives in either 19 or 18 BBY, after torturing and killing its owner, Jedi Master Ashka Boda. 19 BBY is also when Revenge of the Sith takes place. Now, we need to ask, when exactly was his first death? How can we determine this? As said before, in TFU, Palpatine looks exactly the same as he does during ROTJ and DE. And both of those were clone bodies. Does this mean when we see him in TFU, he's also a clone? That's terrible logic to use on so important an issue. An issue imperative we get right, if we are to accurately uncover which version was "the strongest Sith ever." But unless I'm missing some quote or evidence, there is nothing that says explicitly when Palpatine's first death is. If I've gotten that wrong, please correct it. This is, as Gideon says, first and foremost a meeting of minds.
My point for #2 is essentially that since we cannot know for certain when Palpatine dies and his Force potential suffers, we must use what we can be absolutely certain of. Therefore, I submit to this body that given the evidence, and the lack of evidence, that ROTS's version of Darth Sidious be considered the peak version of Palpatine and his personal Force power. Given that he receives the holocron in 19 BBY, that ROTS takes place in 19 BBY, and that we do not know when he first cheats death after this - that is his last and most conclusive showing to safely determine his original body's raw power and combat skill.
3) This point is rather short in comparison, because it states the obvious. But I feel I need to point this out, nonetheless. Why is Force potential so important, and the lack thereof? It is true that knowledge equals power, but only to the extent that you are able to control it and contain it. The rest of where that power comes from is your potential with the Force. While Palpatine's knowledge of the Force is second to none and allowed him to even invent techniques so devastating they covered up his lack of raw power (the Force Storm), this will not do him any good in up close, personal combat. As I am arguing,
Originally posted by Me
Specifically, he is less proficient in combat than other incarnations.
With less Force potential comes less Force reserves, for one. Sidious, in a duel or battle situation in his
Dark Empire form, will tire quicker than other versions. Moreover, it means less Force speed to summon, less Force strength, softer Force shielding, and inferior precognition - which is absolutely crucial in lightsaber battles. These are
tremendous disadvantages for DE (or any clone) Darth Sidious to overcome.
4) Incorrect or misconstrued feats attributed to DE Darth Sidious:
a. 'Sidious can disintegrate lightsabers with his Force Lightning.' This is false, in numerous ways. Let's begin with explaining that he only does this once, ever. Moreover, the quote after doing so can be very telling.
Sidious tells Leia after the fact, "Such an old lightsaber is not a worthy weapon for you."
Now, notice several things. First, he calls the lightsaber unworthy (for her). She is barely a Jedi Knight who is not even half trained. And even she's unworthy of that thing? It must be fairly poor, then, as far as weapons go. Why is this? Well, it is "such an old" weapon. Personally I find Palpatine saying that line hypocritical and downright hilarious (seeing as he was about to die again and looked incredibly old and feeble). Now, just how old was Leia's lightsaber?
"The Jedi weapon that Leia received from the fallen Jedi Vima-Da-Boda is about 10,000 years old."
Ah, that's convenient. So, Palpatine destroys a weapon that is ten millenia old. Has to be weak, then, especially if he considers it unworthy for even a partially trained Jedi Knight. How inferior was it? Hmmm...
The very earliest lightsabers were based on the discovery of natural crystals that spontaneously emit powerful bursts of light and energy at their resonant frequencies...when the lightsaber was invented, warriors did not possess the sophisticated technology of today...The energy efficiency of a modern lightsaber is close to 100%."
Continued next post (Message Length Restraints)