Originally posted by Naz
No, this is just silly sounding to me. Of course married people can't sleep with other people. Part of the reason they got married was to commit themselves fully and forever to their significant other.
Not all marriages are dictated by "la-la land". There are married people who consensually sleep with 3rd parties; it's their business and only there's.
PS Happy 18th, legal one.
Re: Should married people be allowed to sleep with other people?
Originally posted by Aster Phoenix
I had this discussion with a friend the other day, so I thought I would put it to you guys on here.My stance on this is yes. I actually know some couples that do this, they love each other and they stay with each other, they just get sexually bored of each other from time to time and have a little fun on the side. And those couples have stayed together for years longer then the monogamous ones I know have.
I think a huge problem in society today is that we put so much pressure and importance on sex. We get so stressed over it and make such a huge deal out of it that it ends up for allot of people taking the fun out of it.
I think as long as a person is safe and takes precautions and the other person in the relationship is fine with it then they should be allowed to occasionally have casual sex with other people.
But I do know there is other opinions out there and I want to hear them, so let's hear it guys, what do you think on this subject?
I actually had a conversation with a co-worker that said that adultery was illegal. This conversation was in response to the report that Mahoney had more than one extra-marital affair. This co-worker actually had the brass balls to imply that having an affair was illegal. Only the kind of Republican-inspired stupidy that came out the last year of the Clinton administration incites people to actually beieve that adultery is illegal. Gay sex is illegal. But what makes the headlines is when a man has spent the last decade decrying homosexuality after being found down on his sick, sad knees sucking a cock. None of these men have been caught having affairs while also espousing the notion of illegalizing heterosexual extra-marital affairs. No one is saying that adultery should be illegal, but a lot of people that are saying homosexuality should be are ending up with their desperate mouths licking a glory hole. Adultery might be morally wrong, as it should be, but when it's straight cheating it's understood by most people. Especially to married people who often secretly maintain a desire to cheat even if they do not.
If you make a commitment to another human being by slipping a ring on their finger, then you've sealed the deal and should be expected to behave accordingly. If you've gone even further to seal the deal for all straight married people by standing on a stage and condemning sexual relationships between two men or two women, then when you are discovered down on your pathetic, hypocritical knees sucking a cock you should be physically abused on national television. Like flag burning, adultery is an emotional issue and has no place in a constituional amendment.
Originally posted by Markus Corvinus
It's naive to believe that marriage should be between people committed to each other? If you believe that, I wouldn't call you naive, but what's the word I'm looking for...?I think you know.
There are people who happen to be both committed to each other and have extra-martial relationships; obviously a person of your worldly knowledge and experience knows this? But yeah, naive is what you are regardless.
I don't have a problem with it. But if it was MY marriage, I wouldn't let this happen.
I've known couples who did this and they STILL ended they're marriage.
If you are having "bored mechanical sex" from your marriage, then it's not healthy. Most of the marriages I know have both partners adapt to one another. Please one another. If MY wife wants to have sex with someone else, then I'M not doing my job. So I have to adapt. Learn. Communication. Once I succeed, then are marriage would be even better.
So, again, I don't have any problem with it, if both agree, but I would dissaprove with my personal marriage, if I ever get married, which I probably won't. Don't really believe in it anyway.
Originally posted by Devil King
The Clintons don't seem to have gotten a divorce in the last 2 decades.
Exactly. I've also no doubt G.W. has a nice little piece of hee-haw trim on the side, while Laura turns a blind eye and tac's another pair of shoes on the Visa-Black card. Kennedy and Clinton certainly weren't the only two playa-presidents.
Originally posted by Robtard
Exactly. I've also no doubt G.W. has a nice little piece of hee-haw trim on the side, while Laura turns a blind eye and tac's another pair of shoes on the Visa-Black card. Kennedy and Clinton certainly weren't the only two playa-presidents.
Again, I don't think that's fair. I don't think that Bush being a supposed hayseed means he's only capable of getting hayseed pussy. But let's get real here; Bush is not a hayseed. He never was.
Originally posted by Devil King
Again, I don't think that's fair. I don't think that Bush being a supposed hayseed means he's only capable of getting hayseed pussy. But let's get real here; Bush is not a hayseed. He never was.
It wasn't meant that way, his background obviously proves he isn't. I just think that's the kind of vagina he prefers, instead of Laura "Stepford" Bush, she does round-out the image nicely, though.
Originally posted by Robtard
It wasn't meant that way, his background obviously proves he isn't. I just think that's the kind of vagina he prefers, instead of Laura "Stepford" Bush, she does round-out the image nicely, though.
Personally, I keep wondering why anyone that supposedly had personal ambitions would spend the money to actually go to college to get a degree in being librarian.