Originally posted by quanchi112
Supes doesnt have the strength to just throw him into space without Rulk resisting it. Thats the point. Supes needed to injure Darkseid to take him up into space when that was his intention.
So you have no logical reason. Thanks. You are basically saying, rulk can't lose, because I like him.
Originally posted by snyper1982
So you have no logical reason. Thanks. You are basically saying, rulk can't lose, because I like him.
Congratulations! You have now graduated from the Prestigious Quanchi University. You are now able to use and wield the infinite wisdom that is known throughout KMC as Quanchilogic.
*Nods*
Originally posted by snyper1982Again,this all goes down to the simple example I gave many pages back. Whats easier to benchpress? 200 pounds of a 150 pound woman who is resisting you?
So you have no logical reason. Thanks. You are basically saying, rulk can't lose, because I like him.
Lets say your max is 350 pounds.
Originally posted by quanchi112
What makes you say that Darkseid is stronger than Rulk?
Only about 40 years of comics. Darkseid slugs it out with the Justice League, other New Gods and the likes of Doomsday. Rulk has like 5 appearances and although he hasn't lost a "fight" he has never took on anyone with the same level of strength as DC's top characters, with the exception of Thor. And we all know that fight was a joke because Rulk easily took Thor's hammer because there was no gravity.
Originally posted by Zack Fair
Just how will Rulk give Supes any resistance when Supes will be moving at speeds he will not even begin to imagine?
I've tried this before, Quanchi doesn't listen to reason/logic/arguments against Hulk related characters.
Originally posted by The PictDarkseid was a lot more powerful long ago. recently he has been beaten by Doomsday,easily I might add. Supes has beat his head on. Orion has torn his heart out as well. Rulk beat the crap out of Hulk and Thor like they were jokes to him.
Only about 40 years of comics. Darkseid slugs it out with the Justice League, other New Gods and the likes of Doomsday. Rulk has like 5 appearances and although he hasn't lost a "fight" he has never took on anyone with the same level of strength as DC's top characters, with the exception of Thor. And we all know that fight was a joke because Rulk easily took Thor's hammer because there was no gravity.I've tried this before, Quanchi doesn't listen to reason/logic/arguments against Hulk related characters.
Originally posted by quanchi112Quan, that's your opinion. Using Thor or Uatu isn't very convincing since Uatu wasn't there to fight, after all he is a WATCHER, and Thor didn't get close to going all out as compared to how he fought the Destroyer.
Rulk is powerful enough to crush Thor. Different power level entirely.Comparing Spiderman to the Silver Surfer is laughable while Rulk has beaten down a Watcher and Thor,easily.
Supes cant bfr him off of the planet. Thats why and he cant do enough damage to keep the Rulk down.
Superman has used bfr on opponents with better feats than Rulk. This falls back to the Konvikt vs WWH precedent. In this case it's Rulk who doesn't have the showings to support a majority of wins.
Any more problems with this thread and it's getting closed along with people receiving warnings.
Originally posted by quanchi112
Darkseid was a lot more powerful long ago. recently he has been beaten by Doomsday,easily I might add. Supes has beat his head on. Orion has torn his heart out as well. Rulk beat the crap out of Hulk and Thor like they were jokes to him.
Rulk is wet behind the ears he hasn't seen the kind of heat peopel like Superman have faced down. Superman dismisses him in the end 8/10 or 9/10.
Originally posted by BadabingI told them I simply disagreed and the kept asking for answers. That is plain to see.
Quan, that's your opinion. Using Thor or Uatu isn't very convincing since Uatu wasn't there to fight, after all he is a WATCHER, and Thor didn't get close to going all out as compared to how he fought the Destroyer.Superman has used bfr on opponents with better feats than Rulk. This falls back to the Konvikt vs WWH precedent. In this case it's Rulk who doesn't have the showings to support a majority of wins.
Any more problems with this thread and it's getting closed along with people receiving warnings.
Which characters with better feats did he bfr anyways?
Originally posted by AllanklesI disagree. Thor and superman seemed pretty close when they met in avengers/jla.
Rulk is wet behind the ears he hasn't seen the kind of heat peopel like Superman have faced down. Superman dismisses him in the end 8/10 or 9/10.
Originally posted by -K-M-Do you think Supes can bfr Rulk off the planet?
Superman didn't seem to have any troubles taking Konvict away as it was Konvict's friend that stopped Superman using an energy blast which Rulk doesn't have. So not sure why there is a comparison between the two especially since it wasn't Konvict that stoped Superman.
Originally posted by quanchi112
Again,this all goes down to the simple example I gave many pages back. Whats easier to benchpress? 200 pounds of a 150 pound woman who is resisting you?Lets say your max is 350 pounds.
That might make sense if rulk was anywhere near the limit of supermans max weight, but he isn't. Lets say that superman can lift 100,000 tons, and rulk weighs 1 ton that is only .001 percent of his max. Let use your 350 pound example now. That equals out to about .0035 pounds. So yeah, I think I would have absolutely no problem benching a .0035 pound woman strugling, not strugling, whatever. I could do it without batting an eye. LOL. This is why your arguments are illogical. Even with those rough numbers, for supermans max weight and rulks weight, there is a huge margin of error percentage wise that I could still easily bench or chuck into the air, even if they were struggling. Superman is so much stronger than what is required to actually toss rulks weight into the space, that it is a non issue on the weight.
This is also forgoing the fact that superman is so fast that he could have rulk in the air before rulk has time to process a thought. Hard to struggle if the other person can have you flying into the air before you can even think or react to even begin to struggle isn't it? I think it would be easier to bench the 150 pound woman who is struggling than 200 if I can have her benched before she even knew she was being benched or could react to it....
Originally posted by snyper1982I have stated my opinion while you have stated yours. Let it go.
That might make sense if rulk was anywhere near the limit of supermans max weight, but he isn't. Lets say that superman can lift 100,000 tons, and rulk weighs 1 ton that is only .001 percent of his max. Let use your 350 pound example now. That equals out to about .0035 pounds. So yeah, I think I would have absolutely no problem benching a .0035 pound woman strugling, not strugling, whatever. I could do it without batting an eye. LOL. This is why your arguments are illogical. Even with those rough numbers, for supermans max weight and rulks weight, there is a huge margin of error percentage wise that I could still easily bench or chuck into the air, even if they were struggling. Superman is so much stronger than what is required to actually toss rulks weight into the space, that it is a non issue on the weight.This is also forgoing the fact that superman is so fast that he could have rulk in the air before rulk has time to process a thought. Hard to struggle if the other person can have you flying into the air before you can even think or react to even begin to struggle isn't it? I think it would be easier to bench the 150 pound woman who is struggling than 200 if I can have her benched before she even knew she was being benched or could react to it....