Originally posted by quanchi112
Thor wasnt going all out? 😕 What are you basing this off of?When has Thor used his speed to defeat anyone?
It seems like you are trying to downplay Rulk while at the same time exalting Superman and ignoring a whole lot of history .
Ha! Which history? Rulk has no history. Superman on the other hand has a history of speedblitzing bricks like Rulk and putting them down. As far as Thor goes. The Thunder god who commands the lightning and the storm was most certainly not going all out, one hammer blow and then standing around like a living punching bag does not constitute going all out for Thor.
Do you even know what an all out Thor looks like? Because if you thought that was Thor at his best you are sadly mistaken, poorly conceived fight by Loeb; quite simply a poor depiction of Thor's actual abilities.
Superman all out takes this 10/10 against Rulk. Again, a cocky, inexperience brick like Rulk is only getting his ass handed to him here. Inferior speed, less power, less skill, less experience how is he beating Supes without PIS?
Ha! Which history? Rulk has no history. Superman on the other hand has a history of speedblitzing bricks like Rulk and putting them down. As far as Thor goes. The Thunder god who commands the lightning and the storm was most certainly not going all out, one hammer blow and then standing around like a living punching bag does not constitute going all out for Thor.Do you even know what an all out Thor looks like? Because if you thought that was Thor at his best you are sadly mistaken, poorly conceived fight by Loeb; quite simply a poor depiction of Thor's actual abilities.
Which really doesn't matter. Surfer doesn't use his vast list of abilities when he fights Thanos...but it doesn't matter either.
Surfer blasts Thanos. Does nothing.
Thor hammers Rulk. Does nothing.
That's all that matters. It shows their attacks and power level don't compare to their opponent's.
Superman all out takes this 10/10 against Rulk. Again, a cocky, inexperience brick like Rulk is only getting his ass handed to him here. Inferior speed, less power, less skill, less experience how is he beating Supes without PIS?
Rulk is more powerful than Clark.
Originally posted by Pyron_KnightThat's all that matters. It shows their attacks and power level don't compare to their opponent's.
One hammer blow doesn't mean anything to me.
Originally posted by Pyron_Knight
Rulk is more powerful than Clark.
I have yet to see that demonstrated so far. One PIS filled encounter with Thor who was too stiff to get out of the way of Rulk's assault and punching a pacifist Watcher around just don't give the impression that he's anything above Clark, who I'm certain can generate way more damage with his abilities, making him more powerful.
Originally posted by AllanklesRulk has five issues of history and he has amassed pretty impressive feats in that short amount of time.
Ha! Which history? Rulk has no history. Superman on the other hand has a history of speedblitzing bricks like Rulk and putting them down. As far as Thor goes. The Thunder god who commands the lightning and the storm was most certainly not going all out, one hammer blow and then standing around like a living punching bag does not constitute going all out for Thor.Do you even know what an all out Thor looks like? Because if you thought that was Thor at his best you are sadly mistaken, poorly conceived fight by Loeb; quite simply a poor depiction of Thor's actual abilities.
Superman all out takes this 10/10 against Rulk. Again, a cocky, inexperience brick like Rulk is only getting his ass handed to him here. Inferior speed, less power, less skill, less experience how is he beating Supes without PIS?
Thor was going all out. His hammer strikes usually affect his opponents but it didnt seem to affect Rulk at all.
Again,you seem to have problems with Loeb while the feat stands. Its canon and Rulk has proven he is more than Thor can handle.
Originally posted by quanchi112
Thor wasnt going all out? 😕 What are you basing this off of?When has Thor used his speed to defeat anyone?
It seems like you are trying to downplay Rulk while at the same time exalting Superman and ignoring a whole lot of history.
Now I am going to use a page from your playbook, Where is your on panel proof Thor was going all out? If it didn't say he was going all out, how do you know? See how ridiculous that is? That is exactly how you sound when you want an exact number for superman's speed feats.
Originally posted by snyper1982I said Superman was going fast but we cant use at the speed of light. I guess if you want to go this route those characters Superman defeated werent fighting at their best. It was pis.
Now I am going to use a page from your playbook, Where is your on panel proof Thor was going all out? If it didn't say he was going all out, how do you know? See how ridiculous that is? That is exactly how you sound when you want an exact number for superman's speed feats.
Originally posted by quanchi112they havent been shown to do any better, in fact the one superman beat has been shown to fight for the kill most of the time
I said Superman was going fast but we cant use at the speed of light. I guess if you want to go this route those characters Superman defeated werent fighting at their best. It was pis.
Originally posted by quanchi112
I said Superman was going fast but we cant use at the speed of light. I guess if you want to go this route those characters Superman defeated werent fighting at their best. It was pis.
Yeah you said superman was going fast then completely ignored the person he was blitzing... It was a freaking speedster. You need to take the feat in context. If he was just blitzing some non speedster brick, I would agree, but he was blitzing someone on his level in speed, which makes the feat all the more impressive. When has rulk ever shown Superman level reaction times or speed? He hasn't, and until he does, you have viable proof he can LOGICALY hit Superman. Stop using low end showings.
When one character has a VAST speed advantage, and then doesn't use it, that is not fighting at his best... It just means they aren't using all the powers at their disposal.
Originally posted by snyper1982He got the drop on them withut giving them time to react. he defeated them easily while Rulk takes Thor's hammer to the face like its a fart in the wind.
Yeah you said superman was going fast then completely ignored the person he was blitzing... It was a freaking speedster. You need to take the feat in context. If he was just blitzing some non speedster brick, I would agree, but he was blitzing someone on his level in speed, which makes the feat all the more impressive. When has rulk ever shown Superman level reaction times or speed? He hasn't, and until he does, you have viable proof he can LOGICALY hit Superman. Stop using low end showings.When one character has a VAST speed advantage, and then doesn't use it, that is not fighting at his best... It just means they aren't using all the powers at their disposal.
Rulk annihilates Superman. All of Rulk's showings are high while you continue to ignore Superman showings in order to create some false sense of superiority over the Rulk when we both know its the other way around.
Originally posted by quanchi112
He got the drop on them withut giving them time to react. he defeated them easily while Rulk takes Thor's hammer to the face like its a fart in the wind.Rulk annihilates Superman. All of Rulk's showings are high while you continue to ignore Superman showings in order to create some false sense of superiority over the Rulk when we both know its the other way around.
I am ignoring the low end showings you put forth yes. Because they are PIS. We both know superman is like God, and rulk is like an ant in comparison. Superman, is just that much more powerful, and you have no evidence to prove otherwise. Superman is stronger, faster, and has an all around superior power set. You can't prove me wrong, so I am right... Superman 100/10, via any way he chooses.