Originally posted by snyper1982
Why do we have to prove how fast he moves in a fight? That is retarded. Movement speed isn't divided into fighting speed, and non fighting speed. Speed is an innate attribute, it doesn't vary just because he is fighting. The fact that he has proven countless times to have speed and reaction time on levels that rulk only wishes he could have is pointless tough because he hasn't done it "on panel while fighting"... There has already been scans posted showing he can fight at least faster than sound, so until you can show ON PANEL proof of him able to counter even that preposterously slow level of speed for him, your point is moot. Superman is fast enough to make rulk a statue, you know, I know it, everyone knows it, you just don't want rulk to loose so keep coming up with new and ridiculous arguments.
Again,he was shown moving at the speed of sound. I still havent seen him beat anyone near Rulk's level. Rulk shit on Thor and took his hammer strike like it was less than nothing. Again its my opinion and I think you are taking this personally. Rulk could take whatever blows Superman could inflict and then some. It will affect him less than Thor's hammer.
Unless you can prove Superman can fight faster than sound by a scan of him doing it you are just speculating.
Originally posted by snyper1982
Kind of like how you keep saying you think rulk could hit Superman with no proof backing that up? Kind of like that?
Supes has been hit by bricks before,so why is this the exception?