Originally posted by Scoobless
Like I said ... I didn't notice it before.😮
Frankly, I didn't even read the bio, I just did a quick search and posted the first one Google offered me (only had a minute or so to get it posted)
whistling
So... from the evidence Scoobs and Leo presented or from what they're said:
a)my friend overhyped Amadeus Cho;
b)the calculations he does is merely battle-savy analytics and no more complicated than say calculations Ronnie O'Sullivan has to perform during snooker match;
c)Digi was misguided by the line in a bio (which is BS at its highest but at least it can be seen what "TK via mathematical calculations of highest degree" means), I got misguided via investigation where my sourse of information called Amadeus Cho Layla Miller-lite and the arguments on previous page were based on that (originally in my post in the morning I've said that I has nothing against drafting Cho for 5 points and having simply genius with good analitycal skills is acceptable for 5 points (look at my own team, I'm not dumbass to cut down the tree branch I'm sitting on (literal translation of a Russian expression meaning "destroying your own plans by trying to mess with the ones others have"😉).