Originally posted by Kirikaze Fuuma
posted by me :with that I thought you'll understand it's a yes or no. but it seems or you it's just a simple no. I already shown you 3 sources but you still doesn't want to understand. he likes karate gi so he designed Ryu to have a karate style and planned a game which has a main character who has a karate style(AOF).
Its no use. We are talking about a poster who gets uptigh when we mention similarities of characters, whose original creators have nothing to do with each other, like Tung from "Fatal Fury" and Master Roshi, from "Dragonball", and yet on porpuse pretends he doesnt get when the similaities of characters are explained by being done by the same head staff, with info that comes from said game`s manuals.
The concept of a recicled idea being done over and over, seemingly for him, is worse than an ideia being copied from someone else, wathever the intent.
He likes to call it "homages", and for someone like Toryama, it migth as well feel like a homage having a Roshi version 2.0 hanging around a gaming sucess like "Fatal Fury", but it still doesnt erase the fact that if he wanted to (thats assuming he knows about it, in the first place) he would have legal room, to open a court action.
When you are a co-cretor and share the rigths of the same concept, the only reason it would go to court, would be if there was bad blood among the internal staff, and that didnt happen, since the head staff moved together to SNK at the time.