Gladiator vs Wonder Woman

Originally posted by Symmetric Chaos
Yes it does.

Not at all.

It's called an analogy. If you're going to attack it, you should attack the part that makes it analogous.

Of course there will be differences in the details between the original situation and the one offered as an analogy. If every last detail was the same, it wouldn't be an analogy; it would just be the original situation repeated in an identical fashion.

The only display of power by the person pressing the button is the action of pressing the button,

And the only display of power by Superman is vibrating.

But you're not asking me to be impressed that Superman can vibrate. You're asking me to be impressed that Superman OMG EXPELLED A PHANTOM PLANET HOLY WOW AMAZING!

Which is very much like asking me to be impressed that you WOWZERS DESTROYED THE SOLAR SYSTEM BY IMPLODING THE SUN(!) when all you had to do to accomplish the feat was push a button.

I haven't read everything from this debate but vibrating and punching a planet are different. Than of course punching someone so hard next to a planet is even mote impressive if thats what is happening.

Originally posted by KK the Great
That doesn't make the slightest bit of difference.

😂

What a joke.

Originally posted by batdude123
😂

What a joke.

I can't be held accountable for your inability to understand what makes an analogy an analogy.

Originally posted by KK the Great
I can't be held accountable for your inability to understand what makes an analogy an analogy.

You can only be held accountable for your own logical fallacies.

In short: You're a joke.

Originally posted by Tommy05
Ah I see whats wrong. No I messed that up Its Hyperion that showed at least once if I remember.

You have made me laugh I will admit. Aways so bitchy on the Internet?

I suggest therapy. Or at least a hug from your mother.,

Thats right I stooped so low I went to the mother. Kill me now.

Until at least Jon or KK come back I am done for now.

Enjoy your pit of despair.

This really isn't about how anyone acts, or your suggestions because you can't deal with it.

It's about a comic debate and how you're wrong over it.

Originally posted by batdude123
You can only be held accountable for your own logical fallacies.

Is this the part where you start tossing out Latin terms that you don't understand and are using improperly?

I always enjoy that part.

Originally posted by Red Shift
This really isn't about how anyone acts, or your suggestions because you can't deal with it.

It's about a comic debate and how you're wrong over it.

Deal with what? Agreeing with most of the things they said? 😂

Anyway I wont argue, its pathetic. More your territory.

Any Gladiator probably wins this.

Originally posted by KK the Great
Is this the part where you start tossing out Latin terms that you don't understand and are using improperly?

I always enjoy that part.

Straight to the point:

Your "logic" can be applied to nearly everything in comic books.

Character 'A' can lift an entire planet just by using his pinky.

You: So? How is that anymore impressive than somebody pressing a button to move a planet?

Character 'B' can blast a galaxy to smithereens.

You: That's nothing! If somebody just pressed a button to blow up a galaxy, that'd be just as impressive!

Character 'C' can extricate himself from the pull of a black hole.

You: Please. Anyone with a button to do that requires about as little of an effort as character 'C' put into his action.

etc.

That's why I find your pointless argument so funny. It's not just the fact that it has no relevance at all. Using it specifically in this instance is completely arbitrary.

Originally posted by Joey Stacks
But what was the point of posting the scan when the subject was physical prowess?

If you want to hold the strength feat over Nvr, do so. Don't bother brandishing it against people who are starting or are in the middle of completely separate discussions.

Originally posted by batdude123
Straight to the point:

Your "logic" can be applied to nearly everything in comic books.

Character 'A' can lift an entire planet just by using his pinky.

You: So? How is that anymore impressive than somebody pressing a button to move a planet?

Character 'B' can blast a galaxy to smithereens.

You: That's nothing! If somebody just pressed a button to blow up a galaxy, that'd be just as impressive!

Character 'C' can extricate himself from the pull of a black hole.

You: Please. Anyone with a button to do that requires about as little of an effort as character 'C' put into his action.

etc.

That's why I find your pointless argument so funny. It's not just the fact that it has no relevance at all. Using it specifically in this instance is completely arbitrary.

Wow.

So you're completely incapable of following my argument, huh?

Originally posted by KK the Great
Wow.

So you're completely incapable of following my argument, huh?

You don't have an argument. You have a random and nonsensical point that you're trying to pass off as an argument.

But I guess to you...

Originally posted by KK the Great
That doesn't make the slightest bit of difference.

😂

Again, I can't be held accountable for your ineptitude in comprehending the very nature of analogy.

Originally posted by batdude123
Straight to the point:

Your "logic" can be applied to nearly everything in comic books.

Character 'A' can lift an entire planet just by using his pinky.

You: So? How is that anymore impressive than somebody pressing a button to move a planet?

Character 'B' can blast a galaxy to smithereens.

You: That's nothing! If somebody just pressed a button to blow up a galaxy, that'd be just as impressive!

Character 'C' can extricate himself from the pull of a black hole.

You: Please. Anyone with a button to do that requires about as little of an effort as character 'C' put into his action.

etc.

That's why I find your pointless argument so funny. It's not just the fact that it has no relevance at all. Using it specifically in this instance is completely arbitrary.

Perhaps you should re-read what he said a little more carefully.

Originally posted by Jonathanos
Perhaps you should re-read what he said a little more carefully.

You can rework a calculus problem until the cows come home, but it will never come out right if you don't know calculus.

Originally posted by KK the Great
Again, I can't be held accountable for your ineptitude in comprehending the very nature of analogy.

😂

I understand analogy just fine. Your's sucked though. It has no logic to it.

And you're dodging my point to make it seem like your analogy has worth, when in actuality, it doesn't.

Keep it up though. This is cute. 🙂

Originally posted by Jonathanos
Perhaps you should re-read what he said a little more carefully.

Might help.

I understood it the first time, but then, I'm a freak.

The point Batdude and I have both made is that the analogy makes no room for power use, intelligence, and skill or ability.

Anybody with a planet-busting button can press it and bust a planet.

Not anybody with super speed could and would think and perform as well as Superman did in that feat, and many, many others.

Hence why subbing in technology that a toddler could use for powers and skill with the powers that take decades to master makes for a poor, inept analogy.

Originally posted by batdude123
I understand analogy just fine.

Originally posted by batdude123
Straight to the point:

Your "logic" can be applied to nearly everything in comic books.

Character 'A' can lift an entire planet just by using his pinky.

You: So? How is that anymore impressive than somebody pressing a button to move a planet?

Character 'B' can blast a galaxy to smithereens.

You: That's nothing! If somebody just pressed a button to blow up a galaxy, that'd be just as impressive!

Character 'C' can extricate himself from the pull of a black hole.

You: Please. Anyone with a button to do that requires about as little of an effort as character 'C' put into his action.

etc.

The above quotes directly contradict one another.

Originally posted by KK the Great
Again, I can't be held accountable for your ineptitude in comprehending the very nature of analogy.

Lovin' them word a day calenders ain't ya?