Gladiator vs Wonder Woman

Started by KK the Great52 pages

Originally posted by SaintSmurph
Which matters, why?

What was evidently shown was that Superman is more intelligent, and uses this to accomplish vastly more impressive feats without even using strength.

What is so "vastly impressive" about vibrating at a specific frequency?

Again: If I give you a remote control with a single button that will implode the sun and destroy our solar system, and you press the button, should I be impressed that you were capable of pressing a button?

Originally posted by Jonathanos
http://i17.photobucket.com/albums/b97/Jonathanos/Gladiator/GladPlanet1.jpg

http://i17.photobucket.com/albums/b97/Jonathanos/Gladiator/Gladplanet2.jpg

Now thats cool.

My respect for Gladiator has gone up. 😮‍💨

Originally posted by KK the Great
There was no indication that it was anything other than Gladiator, still alive in the future.
But he COULD off.

Thats the point. I think its a fair feat but thats what some people think.

Originally posted by KK the Great
What is so "vastly impressive" about vibrating at a specific frequency?

Again: If I give you a remote control with a single button that will implode the sun and destroy our solar system, and you press the button, should I be impressed that you were capable of pressing a button?

Lulz. That point isn't even close to being correlated.

Originally posted by Tommy05
Well thats better explained.

Got the on panel proof of their planet crushing force, not just the comic saying that because how often are they right? Not doubting Gladiator can do it but its a point.

It wasn't much more than narrative hyperbole, to be honest, but you don't write flowery narration about "planet crushing force" if you're writing a character you only believe to be able to lift 100 tons.

The two issues were written by the same writer, but one was written while he was on a well-known crusade to force a handbook ranking system into the comics and bring the MU down to a more "realistic" level, and the other happened years later when he had given up on that fight and was writing a book full of over-the-top cosmic power levels.

Originally posted by batdude123
Lulz. That point isn't even close to being correlated.

Both cases have a person doing something which is simple for him to do and isn't impressive by itself, but which has large-scale implications beyond the action performed by the person in question.

Originally posted by KK the Great
What is so "vastly impressive" about vibrating at a specific frequency?

Again: If I give you a remote control with a single button that will implode the sun and destroy our solar system, and you press the button, should I be impressed that you were capable of pressing a button?

I find using intelligence and super speed to match a specific frequency, then reverse it, a vastly more impressive use of powers then punching something.

I find removing a planet from this dimension a vastly more impressive feat that punching one.

No, but if you handed me a bunch of supplies and I designed, built and programmed a doomsday device, you should be more impressed than if I kicked something and made it crumble.

Not that this holds any relevancy to the discussion at hand anyways. This isn't Superman vs. Gladiator...

Originally posted by KK the Great
It wasn't much more than narrative hyperbole, to be honest, but you don't write flowery narration about "planet crushing force" if you're writing a character you only believe to be able to lift 100 tons.

The two issues were written by the same writer, but one was written while he was on a well-known crusade to force a handbook ranking system into the comics and bring the MU down to a more "realistic" level, and the other happened years later when he had given up on that fight and was writing a book full of over-the-top cosmic power levels.

To be honest Gladiator are two very inconsistent flying bricks. In some issues you have Thor proving to be his physically superior and others he knocks him about.

With Gladiator you have him destroying punches with his fists then in others you have him punching Colossus and still standing.

The best thing to do with these two is take whatever they do with a grain of salt or whatever the term is. Just level out their averages.

But seeing how Gladiator has proven to be a planet punching character more than he hasn't I would say thats his average.

Hyperion? Hes all over the place and I would place him slightly lower than Thor.

Just IMO know. 🙂

But anyway in this fight Gladiator wins if he takes no BS.

Originally posted by KK the Great
Both cases have a person doing something which is simple for him to do and isn't impressive by itself, but which has large-scale implications beyond the action performed by the person in question.

The difference is that one is using powers to achieve said feat, while the other is using technology.

Big difference.

Even trying to find a connection between the two is asinine.

Originally posted by Tommy05
To be honest Gladiator are two very inconsistent flying bricks. In some issues you have Thor proving to be his physically superior

Lie.

Originally posted by batdude123
The difference is that one is using powers to achieve said feat, while the other is using technology.

That doesn't make the slightest bit of difference.

Originally posted by Red Shift
Lie.
Wow what a compelling argument. I look forward to more of these little debates in the future.. I hope all are as mind boggling as this. 🙂

Originally posted by Tommy05
With Gladiator you have him destroying punches with his fists then in others you have him punching Colossus and still standing.

The Colossus fight was very early in Gladiator's career. Gladiator became the galaxy-spanning, planet-smashing powerhouse of today with FF #249.

I know, that was just ONE example.

Originally posted by Tommy05
Wow what a compelling argument. I look forward to more of these little debates in the future.. I hope all are as mind boggling as this. 🙂

Why bother?

You have no valid points to make, and you'll ignore anything put in front of you.

Originally posted by Red Shift
Why bother?

You have no valid points to make, and you'll ignore anything put in front of you.

You are getting on the defensive for what exactly?

I hope you grow up soon.

KK provided evidence and so did Jon. You have provided what exactly?

Originally posted by KK the Great
That doesn't make the slightest bit of difference.

Yes it does. The only display of power by the person pressing the button is the action of pressing the button, where as vibrating at the right frequency requires superhuman speed and the ability to figure out the right frequency.

But of course you already knew that.

Them posting evidence got them no further than what I've already done. You sitting there dumbstruck making excuses. And lying.

Originally posted by Tommy05
To be honest Gladiator are two very inconsistent flying bricks. In some issues you have Thor proving to be his physically superior and others he knocks him about.

Why even humor you after that?

Thor has NEVER proved physically stronger than Gladiator.

Never.

Originally posted by Red Shift
Them posting evidence got them no further than what I've already done. You sitting there dumbstruck making excuses. And lying.

Why even humor you after that?

Thor has NEVER proved physically stronger than Gladiator.

Never.

Ah I see whats wrong. No I messed that up Its Hyperion that showed at least once if I remember.

You have made me laugh I will admit. Aways so bitchy on the Internet?

I suggest therapy. Or at least a hug from your mother.,

Thats right I stooped so low I went to the mother. Kill me now.

Until at least Jon or KK come back I am done for now.

Enjoy your pit of despair.

Originally posted by Symmetric Chaos
Yes it does. The only display of power by the person pressing the button is the action of pressing the button, where as vibrating at the right frequency requires superhuman speed and the ability to figure out the right frequency.

But of course you already knew that.

But what was the point of posting the scan when the subject was physical prowess?