Originally posted by Insane Titan
bad habit you say, show all the other times then.Onslaught is nothing like Odin power wise
I disagree. In comics, with the exception of a few feats, Odin isn't as powerful as most people here thinks. I would say, on average, 5 Thor's stacked in power is at least as powerful as Odin (Odin would still have an edge because he can control Mjolnir and he is still more versatile). Physically, Odin is high herald level though.
Galactus is far more powerful than Odin as it would take a mere blast of a some seconds to kill Thanos.
Odin and many other characters who spam energy attacks aren't always shown to be very powerful through their blasts.
For example,
Characters like phoenix, ultron, etc. has literally blasted meta beings and down without killing them. It was plot stupidity I know. But it just shows that blasts against characters aren't always a reliable gauge of power in comics. Every character is at the mercy of the writer. That means Spidey can withstand an Odin blast and live if writer's deem it.
With that said, if there is no conflicting, characters are written down and never up when fighting other characters. In comics, we should assume a character is operating at average power UNLESS there is evidence that he's not. So if Spidey beats Firelord and there is no evidence that Spidey is operating above his average (like an amp) then it isn't Spidey that's operating far above his average but rather it is Firelord who is operating far below his average.
Originally posted by Insane Titan
Utter nonsense
Of course it's utter nonsense, because it doesn't suits your thinking.
And he has a point. Phoenix was taken down by Xorn... who will take that seriously? Can Thanos take Phoenix down, because of Phoenix low showings? No he can't, Phoenix is still immensly more powerful than Thanos. So yes, how writers wants it, even if it's stupid to the core.
Like Squirell Girl beating Thanos... in that time it was thought as trully real Thanos. Did I take it seriously even in that time... no. Thanos still immensly above her. Some feats are just to ignore, even if canon.
And in Onslaught case... it doesn't matter... Onslaught is far more powerful than Thanos.
Originally posted by h1a8This post amounts to absolutely nothing
I disagree. In comics, with the exception of a few feats, Odin isn't as powerful as most people here thinks. I would say, on average, 5 Thor's stacked in power is at least as powerful as Odin (Odin would still have an edge because he can control Mjolnir and he is still more versatile). Physically, Odin is high herald level though.Galactus is far more powerful than Odin as it would take a mere blast of a some seconds to kill Thanos.
Odin and many other characters who spam energy attacks aren't always shown to be very powerful through their blasts.
For example,
Characters like phoenix, ultron, etc. has literally blasted meta beings and down without killing them. It was plot stupidity I know. But it just shows that blasts against characters aren't always a reliable gauge of power in comics. Every character is at the mercy of the writer. That means Spidey can withstand an Odin blast and live if writer's deem it.With that said, if there is no conflicting, characters are written down and never up when fighting other characters. In comics, we should assume a character is operating at average power UNLESS there is evidence that he's not. So if Spidey beats Firelord and there is no evidence that Spidey is operating above his average (like an amp) then it isn't Spidey that's operating far above his average but rather it is Firelord who is operating far below his average.
Originally posted by Xplosiveyou're only agreeing with it because I challenged you.
Of course it's utter nonsense, because it doesn't suits your thinking.And he has a point. Phoenix was taken down by Xorn... who will take that seriously? Can Thanos take Phoenix down, because of Phoenix low showings? No he can't, Phoenix is still immensly more powerful than Thanos. So yes, how writers wants it, even if it's stupid to the core.
Already other posters have called it nothing.
If you could actually back up your own argument you wouldn't need to piggy back other posters poor points.
Not true at all Insane Titan. I just gave my thinking.... sometimes I just ignore feats, because they can be stupid to the core and we all know it.
Like Squirell Girl beating Thanos... in that time it was thought as a trully real Thanos. Did I take it seriously even in that time?... no. Thanos still immensly above her. Some feats are just to ignore, even if canon.
And in Onslaught case it doesn't matter... Onslaught is far more powerful than Thanos.
This is Thanos vs. Onslaught (including Nate and Franklin). It's a non prep fight. You yourself know that Onslaught power level is far beyond Thanos, but because Onslaught storyline, you can go and say Onslaught didn't have this feat and that and convincing yourself that way to make yourself feel better, because this only way you can. But here it doesn't work this way. Like I said... non prep, CIS/PIS off, Onslaught with all powers he had vs. Thanos... Onslaught stomps him and Thanos wouldn't even be a worthy opponent.
More nonsense than h1's post. You can try and twist it to your advantage all you want , we still go by feats the character has actually done.
If we go by your logic Thanos can crush Onslaught seeing as a weaker Thanos clone absorbed and released enough energy to make the universe scream and kill the Rot(which was more powerful than Death and consuming the 616 reality) . Onslaught gets destroyed.
Originally posted by Insane Titan
More nonsense than h1's post. You can try and twist it to your advantage all you want , we still go by feats the character has actually done.If we go by your logic Thanos can crush Onslaught seeing as a weaker Thanos clone absorbed and released enough energy to make the universe scream and kill the Rot(which was more powerful than Death and consuming the 616 reality) . Onslaught gets destroyed.
Prove that Thanos can even harm or damage Onslaught in the slightest?