Iran blasts Obama's nuclear criticism
http://www.cnn.com/2008/WORLD/meast/11/08/iran.obama/index.html
So much for changing THAT relationship.
Iran blasts Obama's nuclear criticism
http://www.cnn.com/2008/WORLD/meast/11/08/iran.obama/index.html
So much for changing THAT relationship.
OBAMA: We should negotiate with Iran.
REPUBLICANS SUCH AS KIDROCK: That won't work. He should be agressive, because Iran is our enemy.
OBAMA: I will make sure Iran doesn't have weapons and will invade if necessary.
REPUBLICANS SUCH AS KIDROCK: Obama's gonna start war with Iran, which is now bad.
Any questions?
Originally posted by lord xyz
OBAMA: We should negotiate with Iran.
REPUBLICANS SUCH AS KIDROCK: That won't work. He should be agressive, because Iran is our enemy.
OBAMA: I will make sure Iran doesn't have weapons and will invade if necessary.
REPUBLICANS SUCH AS KIDROCK: Obama's gonna start war with Iran, which is now bad.Any questions?
LORDXYZ: Who cares if Obama is friends with a racist preacher and a terrorist. Bush IS a racist AND a terrorist!
Yeah, Ahmadinejad is a terrorist, FOX said so.
It's ridiculous how you and others like you see the Ahmadinejad and other Middle Eastern leaders as potential threats...and at the same time, urging the need to raise taxes on defense which is already the biggest in the world and takes up 30% of the US budget.
Spend that money on helping the poor for ****s sake, since you already have money to burn.
I agree, to a certain point with the parliamentary leader.
Iran has shown their ugly colors before. Since Israel is a huge ally of ours, it would be retarded to think that we would just sit back and do nothing.
Just because an Iranian leader has spoken out about this doesn't mean that it is the end all be all of this debate. There WILL be unconditional talks AND some appeasement going on under the Obama administration. Much better than we had under the shit on everything Bush administration. If Iran does get out of hand and does show perfectly veritable evidence of a strike on Israel, I fully expect Obama to take military action. However, it had better not be another Iraq and I want mother ****in' evidence or admission from Iran.
I personally prefer that we not have to meddle in world affairs like that. I'd like it if we could just **** and smoke weed all day, but that's just me.
Originally posted by lord xyz
Yeah, Ahmadinejad is a terrorist, FOX said so.It's ridiculous how you and others like you see the Ahmadinejad and other Middle Eastern leaders as potential threats...and at the same time, urging the need to raise taxes on defense which is already the biggest in the world and takes up 30% of the US budget.
Spend that money on helping the poor for ****s sake, since you already have money to burn.
More lies, you clearly have no idea what my policy's and thoughts are.
Originally posted by KidRock
More lies, you clearly have no idea what my policy's and thoughts are.
OK, one last time, what are your policies and thoughts?
Prove to us that you aren't the lonely, ignorant right-wing/christian 12 year old hiding in your parents' basement that you appear to be.
(Also, in the 2 weeks that I've visited the GDF you have looked like the only actual racist I've met yet on KMC. Just letting you know.)
Originally posted by Grand-Moff-Gav
Why should Iran not have nuclear capabilities?
Why does Russia need to disarm?
Ask Obama.
Russia can do whatever it wants, same as Iran...we don't police the world. I am against Iran getting nuclear weapons though due to evidence of them supporting/supplying Iraqies fighting against us.
Unless they do something that threatens us then we should act.
It's not totally outrageous to view this aggressive nuclear agenda between Iran and North Korea as nothing more than a defensive measure after Bush's New Axis of Evil speech in 2003. Every leader who could be considered on-par with Saddam knows of the potential consequences in going directly against the U.S. Donald Snow's security dilemma is an idea that the Bush administration shouldn't have ignored.
I personally think that if they want Nukes, let's just let them have a few... and warn them that if they fire off a single one we'll wipe them off the face of the planet. Nuclear weaponry is just a sign of power and respect, all the countries that have nuclear weapons don't get ****ed with while the third world countries that don't have them get exploited.
Originally posted by KidRockYou have stated on this forum before that you are against Obama's plan to cut missle defense from the budget, so it's obvious you believe US defense to be important.
More lies, you clearly have no idea what my policy's and thoughts are.
You have also stated you are against Obama negotiating with Ahmedinejad, and have stated him to be a terrorist.
You are also against Obama's socialised health care plan.
So, I guess I do know your policies.
Originally posted by lord xyz
You have stated on this forum before that you are against Obama's plan to cut missle defense from the budget, so it's obvious you believe US defense to be important.
So do you think its not important?
Originally posted by lord xyz
You have also stated you are against Obama negotiating with Ahmedinejad, and have stated him to be a terrorist.
Where?
Originally posted by KidRock
Russia can do whatever it wants, same as Iran...we don't police the world. I am against Iran getting nuclear weapons though due to evidence of them supporting/supplying Iraqies fighting against us.
If every kid at Virginia Tech had been armed with a gun then no one would have died that day.
Originally posted by lord xyz
I believe it's way over funded.Can't find it, I remember it being in one of the political threads by Strangelove.
I dont think you can ever spend too much when it comes to peoples safety..thats just me though.
And keep looking, I would like to see where I called Ahmadinijad a terrorist.