Iran blasts Obama's nuclear criticism

Originally posted by KidRock
So...why arent there school shootings every day there if it would drive anyone insane? Or better yet at Harvard or Yale..certainly they must be more secretive and hateful maybe? Are you saying US culture is oppressive, hateful and secretive?

And you couldnt find it cause it doesn't exist. You're delusional and because my views differ from yours you make up fairy tales in your head.

The US culture is. You guys keep 5 guns in your house for that off-chance someone might break in.

Yeah, I'm delusional.

Originally posted by lord xyz
[B]Well, there's the restraint, lack of confidence, wanting to not look like a dick.

Yes, because obviously this is a personality trait(s) that only exists in the US.

The US culture is. You guys keep 5 guns in your house for that off-chance someone might break in.

Not even the majority of "us guys" have a gun in our house.

Originally posted by Mindship
-- Dadude 4 Prez n 2012 --

😆

Well, if you put it that way...tax credits for those who purchase comic books.

edit-

I read the rest of the thread. Damn, a whole lot of shit crawled up everyone's ass. Seriously, I think everyone could use some sex and a bowl of weed right now.

Originally posted by Symmetric Chaos
Actually odds are the cross fire would have lead to more deaths.

Exactly. Sadly, though, this is the opinion expressed by several of the Republican presidential candidates during the media coverage of the shooting.

Originally posted by KidRock
Well if all guns were banned the shooting never would have happened. Criminals obey the law.

This one did follow the law. The law failed those people who died. He didn't disclose his mental health background and no one checked. This is because the more important factor in all this was the money that changed hands, not the lives it put in danger.

Originally posted by lord xyz
If the US had a half decent culture, no one would've died that day.

It does, but only half of it is decent.

Originally posted by KidRock
A manic depressive Korean immigrant shoots up a school because he is rejected by a girl and it is the US cultures fault?

Riiiight.

What about the school shooting in Finland? Do they not have a half decent culture as well?

A depressed Korean immigrant that suffered from several disorders and had lived here since he was 2 or 3, if I recall.

Originally posted by lord xyz
Well, there's the restraint, lack of confidence, wanting to not look like a dick.

The US culture is. You guys keep 5 guns in your house for that off-chance someone might break in.

Yeah, I'm delusional.

You're still not telling me how any of this made a man go on a shooting spree and kill 30 people though. The culture of the US had nothing to do with the shooting, the mental disorders and lack of restraint he had did.

The US is no more an oppressive culture then a country like Japan is with their unique customs and pressure put on the kids.

You're creating things in your mind that you think I said, when I really didn't..that is delusional.

edit:

Who here supports Iran building nuclear weapons? Is anyone against it?

I support it, personally.

I have found proof that the Russians are at heart- American lovers.

YouTube video

Originally posted by lord xyz
OBAMA: We should negotiate with Iran.
REPUBLICANS SUCH AS KIDROCK: That won't work. He should be agressive, because Iran is our enemy.
OBAMA: I will make sure Iran doesn't have weapons and will invade if necessary.
REPUBLICANS SUCH AS KIDROCK: Obama's gonna start war with Iran, which is now bad.

Any questions?

Oddly, that's pretty much it.

That video is atrocious. It's like a post-communist amalgamation of the B-52's and redneck rock. Sadly, it's the most professional looking musical number I've seen out of Russia. Granted, the only music videos I usually see out of Russia is when the microphone electrocutes the lead singer, half the stage collapses and the bear dressed as a hooker goes berserk and kills someone in the audience that's gathered around the organ grinder.

Now, did you mean "bear" as in the proper, or a large hairy gay-man with a leather fetish?

Originally posted by Robtard
Now, did you mean "bear" as in the proper, or a large hairy gay-man with a leather fetish?

No, Bear proper; as in the big hairy wild animal that they've trained to ride a unicycle and wear a pointy hat and dress for the amusement of a crowd. But I understand the confusion since I also mentioned an organ grinder.

Oh, very good then.

I always find it amusing that after some wild animal that's been trained to wear stupid clothes and do stupid tricks, snaps one day and mauls someone, then it's always "I don't understand, it was very gentle and never showed any aggression, how could this have happened." Stupid people, I say.

Originally posted by KidRock

Who here supports Iran building nuclear weapons? Is anyone against it?

Nuclear weapons? Meh.

Nuclear power? Hell yeah.

lol, alright, this seems like the appropriate thread to do this in:

Impromptu poll:

What are you more worried about as the most likely potential escalation of the conflict raging in the Middle East? And just for curiosity sake, which option would do the most to destabilize the region?

a) America attacking Iran
b) Iran attacking America
c) Iran attacking Israel
d) Israel attacking Iran

EDIT:

Originally posted by KidRock
Who here supports Iran building nuclear weapons? Is anyone against it?

I don't support it for the reason I don't support any nation having nuclear weapons.

Realistically, I don't see it as a good thing, as it will destabalize the tenuous relationship between Saudi Arabia and Iran, but I don't see it as a threat to myself or really to America. If anything, it is a defensive manuver against the Israelis.

I very much see the situation as nearly identical to Pakistan having nuclear weapons. Not a good thing, but not as bad as it is being propogated to us in the West. Its like, heaven forbid someone actually wants to defend themselves (lol, so appropriate after watching a video on Waco)

America attacking Iran or Iran attacking Israel.

sorry bards, I had to change it, I forgot to say "most likely"

I stand by my answer.

Originally posted by inimalist
lol, alright, this seems like the appropriate thread to do this in:

[b]Impromptu poll:

What are you more worried about as the most likely potential escalation of the conflict raging in the Middle East? And just for curiosity sake, which option would do the most to destabilize the region?

a) America attacking Iran
b) Iran attacking America
c) Iran attacking Israel
d) Israel attacking Iran[/B]

Iran attacking Israel. America attacking Iran would probably cause almost as much damage.

Iranians are not stupid. They're not just going to barge into a war.

Ahmadinejad may be a backward psychotic Khamini-act-a-like, but he's not siucidal.

So priority worry goes to America attacking Iran.

Originally posted by lil bitchiness
Iranians are not stupid. They're not just going to barge into a war.

Ahmadinejad may be a backward psychotic Khamini-act-a-like, but he's not siucidal.

So priority worry goes to America attacking Iran.