If Jesus ran for office...

Started by Grand-Moff-Gav5 pages

If Jesus ran for office...

YouTube video

Watch this satirical video on how republicans might respond to a campaign of Jesus Christ to become President of the US. Think about it, then comment.

Republican Christians...are you really in line with Jesus?

He would not win. He was a Jew. 😛

I think Kid Rock is somewhere thinking he was absolutely right about how the entire country sees Barack Obama.

On the other hand, I think most "christians" in this country would kick Jesus's ass and drag him around with their pick up truck until his head came off and then they'd call him a tree-hugging, liberal socialist, ****** lover who "wown'ts tah sprayd ur weylth".

NOT IN MY OVAL OFFICE!!!!

Does "Oval Office" not seem like it would be a euphemism for "vagina"?

Not really.

Originally posted by Shakyamunison
He would not win. He was a Jew. 😛

Win

Re: If Jesus ran for office...

That video ignores the fact that Jesus was a total badass in-line with Republican ideals. He approved of his followers carrying swords (the gun of the time) and he wasn't a peaceful liberal either, as he threatened the Jew money-lenders by shaking a whip at them once and knocked over a few tables.

I wouldn't vote for him. Mainly because he couldn't run for office at all.

Re: Re: If Jesus ran for office...

Originally posted by Robtard
That video ignores the fact that Jesus was a total badass in-line with Republican ideals. He approved of his followers carrying swords (the gun of the time) and he wasn't a peaceful liberal either, as he threatened the Jew money-lenders by shaking a whip at them once and knocked over a few tables.
But you gotta look at the context.

Saw that video a long time ago.

Edward Current is awesome, though. This is one of his less funny videos.

Originally posted by Symmetric Chaos
I wouldn't vote for him. Mainly because he couldn't run for office at all.
✅ Damn foreigners 😛

Mixing old and new testaments isn't fair. They contradict each other. If you look at Paul, it seems that he was more into socialism. Jesus by himself would not make a good ruler UNLESS, others followed suit.

I would vote for him.

Buddha can be Vice President. Mohammed can be Secretary of State. Krishna can be Foreign policy administrator.

Originally posted by Deja~vu
Mixing old and new testaments isn't fair. They contradict each other. If you look at Paul, it seems that he was more into socialism. Jesus by himself would not make a good ruler UNLESS, others followed suit.

He's Jesus. Everyone would follow him.

Originally posted by Symmetric Chaos
He's Jesus. Everyone would follow him.

not everyone.

Originally posted by Devil King
not everyone.

Well if he had a way to prove it all Christians would follow him. Then there's the whole "all other faiths are probably wrong" thing that nets him a few more. Charisma picks up the rest. Ninja assassins (implied but never shown in the Bible) remove all remaining dissent.

Originally posted by Symmetric Chaos
Well if he had a way to prove it all Christians would follow him. Then there's the whole "all other faiths are probably wrong" thing that nets him a few more. Charisma picks up the rest. Ninja assassins (implied but never shown in the Bible) remove all remaining dissent.

If he could prove it, then there is no need for "faith". "Faith" is the catch 22 of every religion experince and subscribed to in every epoch.

Originally posted by Devil King
If he could prove it, then there is no need for "faith". "Faith" is the catch 22 of every religion experince and subscribed to in every epoch.

I think if Jesus were to show up faith would be pretty much out the window.

Originally posted by Symmetric Chaos
I think if Jesus were to show up faith would be pretty much out the window.

But he never does. He's found in burnt toast or a piss stain on an over pass, but he never heals anyone in front of cameras. Just as many people have been healed by "Christ" or "Mary" as have been cured by placebo or faith in Allah or a meteor flying overhead. Just as meany have the same deformed, incapable or homosexual demographics that do not effect that propoganda.