Originally posted by SIDIOUS 66
Except the ship was supposedly wrecked and un-usable; it was crushed. This is contradicted, because it is running fine, even after his death. Can you find proof that he had it repaired, or used the force to repair it.
It's quite obvious that he didn't repair it; there are still portions open to hard vacuum. We now have 2 contradicting canon sources, but I believe that KotOR takes precedence. (because it rocks my sox off.) If Kotor is to be believed, then we have N lifting a mostly intact ship off of the surface of a planet. This is a valid feat, as it is canon. Wisely, you have not disputed this. He had to maintain its integrity as he lifted it miles into the air. This shows both power and skill.
Vader is shown in TFU to crush a durasteel hut. This would consist of him crumpling the various walls. Therefore the feat is essentially the destruction of several sheets of durasteel simultaneously. Do you really want to argue that crushing 12 (6 planes in a cube, doubled to account for walls) sheets of metal took more overall force than to lift a kilometer long spaceship, while having to maintain the structural integrity (such as it was) of said ship? You have to see reason.
Originally posted by SIDIOUS 66
For the record, it is harder to crush a tin can, than it is to lift a cardboard box
Therein lies the dificulty in comparing such larger than life accomplishments to daily life. There is no common analog to lifting a 1200 meter spaceship. We (and clearly you) simply can't grasp the massive quantities of energy we are dealing with.
In a last, probably misguided attempt to show the utter failure of the analogies this far, lets quantify the force. We'll use nice round numbers, and I think that I have to say that I'm pulling the figures out of my ass. This isn't definitive, it is meant as an example of how phrasing the accomplishments in today's terms warps and skews the comparison.
Force required to lift Ravager: 100,000
Force required to crush 12 metal plates: 1000
Note: the units or even specific numbers are irrelevant. Focus on how the relationship between the two figures changes as we cram them into everyday situations.
Human experience occupies a very small portion of reality: everything travels very slowly in comparison with c, matter is impermeable to other matter, and our physical perceptions and ability to shape our environment are extremely limited. (We see only a sliver of the EM spectrum and our bodies exert relatively small amounts of force on our environment.) To fit the number 100,000 into our experience, we have to diminish it and compare it to our own world. The metaphor of choice here was "lifting a cardboard box." This seems valid, as in both cases an object is lifted. How about we call lifting a cardboard box equal to 10 units.
The problem arises when we try to find a everyday analogue to crushing something. Clearly we can't just say "lifted something lighter" because a very different motion is being attempted. We have to find something that we crush that would be as easy in comparrison to crushing durasteel as lifting a box was to lifting the Ravager. If lifting the box is equal to .0001 times the force of the Ravager, then crushing this object must be equal to .0001 times the force to crush the metal. We need something two orders off magnitude easier to do than lift a cardboard box. I know of no such thing. Perhaps crumpling a sheet of paper.
Now we have:
Lifting the Ravager = 100,000 : lifting a box = 10
We had to find a similar ratio.
Crushing the hut = 1000 : crumpling a piece of paper = .1
In both cases, the original force was multiplied by .0001 to cram it into human life. This shows why a piece of paper was a better analogy, but what happens if we use a tin can?
Lifting the Ravager = 100,000 : lifting a box = 10 (just like before)
Crushing the hut = 1000 : Crushing a tin can = ________
The tin can has to be > lifting a box (I think- does anyone know for sure which takes more effort?) but it destroys the equation. It changes the setup from a formula into an inequality,
(100000 : 1000 =/= 10 : [x>10])
which just shows that the tin can simply does not fit here. It might if you would replace the cardboard box with, say, a car, but your analogy is flawed. The fact that it can be proved mathematically just shows how far off base you were.
I hope you followed this, because I might have the patience for one more response without an ad homenim. I don't know if I can keep this up without flaming someone.
Aw heck, I can't resist: You haven't got a shred of an argument left. Give it up.