Superman, Orion, Gladiator and Hal Jordan vs Thor, BRB, Black Adam and Captain Marvel

Originally posted by quanchi112
Are you saying that Thor isnt the most powerful?

yes.

Magic users dont automatically beat him but someone like Black adam should be able to beat him imo for the majority. He doesnt pull his punches. He is a lot more vicious than Superman.

and there's nothing in the thread start to indicate superman would hold back... bloodlust is on.

Originally posted by Enyalus
Captain Obvious tonight? 😛

It should be anyone's interpretation. Or at the very minimum that Superman was in no shape or form winning their little contest. So concluding that Superman (or Orion for that matter) would beat BA for the majority is completely baseless.

not to me... 😛

Thor, BRB, Black Adam and Captain Marvel are weak links 😈

Originally posted by Raoul
not to me... 😛

Fanboy! 😱

Originally posted by Raoul
yes.

and there's nothing in the thread start to indicate superman would hold back... bloodlust is on.

not to me... 😛

So,Superman fights out of character?

Originally posted by Enyalus
Fanboy! 😱

pot, kettle? ha-son

Originally posted by quanchi112
What has Superman done powerwise that is close to the godblast or the Durok feat?

So,Superman fights out of character?

he has comparable strength feats, imo. i would say thor is probably the most versatile (even if compared with hal, its arguable imo), but if he was that overly powerful, guys like orion and superman wouldnt give him the trouble they most likely would...

bloodlust is on. just because he chooses to be a pacifist more often than not doesn't mean he's incapable of putting people down when he needs to. Just look at dd rex, or imperiex, or manchester black's elite.

Originally posted by Raoul
he has comparable strength feats, imo. i would say thor is probably the most versatile (even if compared with hal, its arguable imo), but if he was that overly powerful, guys like orion and superman wouldnt give him the trouble they most likely would...

bloodlust is on. just because he chooses to be a pacifist more often than not doesn't mean he's incapable of putting people down when he needs to. Just look at dd rex, or imperiex, or manchester black's elite.

Originally posted by kgkg
I think he is talking about Power Output rather than strength

if he is, then yes, thor has more bang for his buck, but that's picking and choosing, imo...

cyclops has more power output than wolverine, but cyclops can't survive a bullet to the head...

Originally posted by Raoul
pot, kettle? ha-son

he has comparable strength feats, imo. i would say thor is probably the most versatile (even if compared with hal, its arguable imo), but if he was that overly powerful, guys like orion and superman wouldnt give him the trouble they most likely would...

bloodlust is on. just because he chooses to be a pacifist more often than not doesn't mean he's incapable of putting people down when he needs to. Just look at dd rex, or imperiex, or manchester black's elite.

Originally posted by kgkg
I think he is talking about Power Output rather than strength

Originally posted by Raoul
if he is, then yes, thor has more bang for his buck, but that's picking and choosing, imo...

cyclops has more power output than wolverine, but cyclops can't survive a bullet to the head...

Originally posted by quanchi112
[B]You really have to push Superman to have him not hold back. But its fair that he doesnt hold back. I still think BA would come out the winner between the two. It would be close whichever side of the fence you are on.

i wouldn't argue that it would be close... i just see supes winning against adam if he really was up against the wall...

Yep. Thats why I said power and not strength. How is that picking and choosing?

because i could turn around and say something like 'well superman is physically stronger/faster/more durable'

if you want to talk about pure power, then sure, thor would have the advantage, but superman has enough in other areas to be his equal, and imo, his superior...

Originally posted by Raoul
i wouldn't argue that it would be close... i just see supes winning against adam if he really was up against the wall...

because i could turn around and say something like 'well superman is physically stronger/faster/more durable'

if you want to talk about pure power, then sure, thor would have the advantage, but superman has enough in other areas to be his equal, and imo, his superior...

I wouldnt disagree with that. That isnt picking and choosing. I said Thor was the most powerful and now you agree. I didnt mean he was stronger. Their strength is both comparable but I see Supes stronger.

Again,magical weakness and the power thing sell this for Thor imo.

Superman can always Speed blitz Thor

Originally posted by quanchi112
Thats your opinion and you are a huge Superman fan.

i really don't see how that makes a difference.

Its all fine and dandy but I agree in a dc comic I couldnt see them writing Superman losing in that situation. On here though I see Adam having the advantage due to the whole magic thing.

the magic thing just isn't that big of an advantage, imo...

Originally posted by quanchi112
Thats your opinion and you are a huge Superman fan.

Orion is stronger then thor...thor has some of the odinforce not the whole thing and so far hasn't used it to any real things beyond herald feats,orion in a forum battle has more power then anyone in this fight and is the physical equal of supermans.

Originally posted by Badabing
Just because someone has a character in their sig doesn't make them biased.

But accusing someone just kills any friendly debate

Originally posted by kgkg
True , but there is a strong correlation btw the two 😉

But accusing someone just kills any friendly debate

😛

Originally posted by kgkg
True , but there is a strong correlation btw the two 😉

But accusing someone just kills any friendly debate

that's like saying that because i don't have thor in my sig, that i'm biased against him...

Originally posted by Raoul
pot, kettle? ha-son

Pfft. I'm not a fanboy. I'm a hater. There's a huge difference.

Originally posted by Enyalus
Pfft. I'm not a fanboy. I'm a hater. There's a huge difference.

meh, at least you're honest about it, that's something at least...

Originally posted by Raoul
that's like saying that because i don't have thor in my sig, that i'm biased against him...

It's not always true but I find there is a strong correctional with the two doesn't mean it's wrong to support "your character" my any means 😉

lets take quanchi112 for example "thanos is god" 😄

So in my theory you would be more supportive of superman than not and some could see this as Bias from there point of view.

I think i drank to much 🙂