Star Trek Vs. Star Wars

Originally posted by jaden101
That wasn't a a cube. I was never clarified what type of vessel it was. Whether it was taken from another race or whether it was built by the rogue borg.

Was it.............the freed Borgs chasing the Enterprise?

Also, the Delta Flyer had a "similar" shield. It was actually invented while in the Delta Quadrant. That just goes to show how resourceful the Star Trek side is in creating new technologies on the fly...whereas, the SW universe hasn't really created anything new except for a planet buster.

Originally posted by dadudemon
Was it.............the freed Borgs chasing the Enterprise?

Yeah...you can see it at 18 seconds on this vid

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xxIuW23QlOc

That's it ^

SO is it pretty much settled that the SW side loses to ST?

Originally posted by Badabing
I thought it was that torpedo looking Borg ship?

that was in voyager. 😛

Seems like we've been mainly talking about the ships and the space battles

How about when it comes to Jedi, Sith surely they must there the SW side.

Would the ST ships be able to avoid a SD coming out of hyperspace and ramming then head on Kamikaze style...?

Originally posted by Kazenji
Seems like we've been mainly talking about the ships and the space battles

How about when it comes to Jedi, Sith surely they must there the SW side.

See the OP for criteria.

I gotta admitt. 3 months ago I absolutely hated Star Trek but I gave it another shot by watching Next Generation again on Sci-Fi and I'm come to respect it ALOT more. But I still prefer Star Wars anyday of the week.

Originally posted by Sadako of Girth
Would the ST ships be able to avoid a SD coming out of hyperspace and ramming then head on Kamikaze style...?

yes. because star trek ships can track ships that are travelling at warp.

Ah ok. Thanks for the clarification, Raoul. 🙂

Originally posted by Sadako of Girth
Ah ok. Thanks for the clarification, Raoul. 🙂

np. it's a common thing, it was even happening in enterprise.

"there's a ship approaching at warp _. it'll be here in __ minutes."

Yep but I just wondered if warp sensors could detect something coming out of Hyperspace, if there is any difference in travelling method/detection methods...?

But since we have evidence on the ST side for detection, of one kind, I guess we can safely assume that any prolonged conflict with the SW posse would give them the answers they'd need...

The majority of SW-EU forumites are heavily SW-biased; I was involved in two ST vs. SW debates and they had incredible nerves to believe Stardestroyer.net in its entirety in UFP vs. GE (pre-DS1-era) and Enterprise-E vs. Darth Caedus' ship (whatever it is.) despite the heavy bias of that site.

However, the dorsal hardpoints of Imperators would have 20,000 TJ yields (4.8 megatons; this kind of yields could vaporize a small town in one shot) - and presumably longer effective range than trench and ventral hardpoints (1,000 km for orbital bombardment)

JJ Abrams' Narada vs. Executor.

Which would actually survive in this type of onslaught??

If we're talking about firepower, we know that a Romulan fleet of 20 ships destroyed 30% of a planet's surface in a single salvo (in not hours, nor minutes, but seconds). Federation, Klingon, and other technologically equal groups should have similar firepower capabilities. Races like the Borg would have greater capabilities. Races like the Kazon would have less.

We also know that ST weapons to be very effective at ranges of 10,000 KM, with maximum, stated effective ranges at 100,000 to 250,000 KM.

How would phaser-2s (or phaser-3s) compare to SW fighter weapons?

Of course, their widebeam drilling or kill modes could vaporize an entire infantry squad when properly aimed. And I'd say that photon grenades could destroy them outright.

Originally posted by FE Expert
How would phaser-2s (or phaser-3s) compare to SW fighter weapons?

In First Contact, a single phaser rifle blast blew apart the Enterprise's navigational deflector dish after the dish was cut off from its volatile anti-proton sourse.

Originally posted by Acrosurge
Unknown, although a single phaser(2) was stated to be able to blow up half a building at full power.

In First Contact, a single phaser rifle blast blew apart the Enterprise's navigational deflector dish after the dish was cut off from its volatile anti-proton sourse.

Phaser rifles are much stronger than phaser pistols....so that is very much a valid point.

To be able to blow up half a house at full power could also mean said blast could do significant damage to SW fighters and vehicles, maybe blow a TIE fighter off. Or vaporize an AT-AT's neck...

Originally posted by FE Expert
To be able to blow up half a house at full power could also mean said blast could do significant damage to SW fighters and vehicles, maybe blow a TIE fighter off. Or vaporize an AT-AT's neck...

That's exactly what it means. Actually, it's more pronounced than just that. It would vaporize the AT-ATs head.