MFA fighter to get 10 years.....
What do you guys think, is this MFA fighter extremely smart, or an asshead?
MFA fighter to get 10 years.....
What do you guys think, is this MFA fighter extremely smart, or an asshead?
For mischief?
WTF...????
Watch out..!
Everyone from the The Banana Splits, the Gremlins all the way to circus clowns..
ALL will shit themselves where they hear of this new precident.
The guy was a bit stupid if he courted the publicity and was be shocked when they printed the story.
So MENSA can move on and forget all about this clued-up cat.
Originally posted by Sadako of Girth
For mischief?
WTF...????Watch out..!
Everyone from the The Banana Splits, the Gremlins all the way to circus clowns..
ALL will shit themselves where they hear of this new precident.The guy was a bit stupid if he courted the publicity and was be shocked when they printed the story.
So MENSA can move on and forget all about this clued-up cat.
He did it with perfect forethought, as the article may imply.
He may have fully known the ramifications of this and realized that it would stir publicity for him, furthering his deep beliefs.
You see, you don't need to be a religious fanatic to be a moron who yells and screams their believes to all who won't and will hear.
Originally posted by jaden101
There's even a group called the "anarchist alliance"...hahaha...idiots
😆 😆 😆
I googled it. That is..just...retarded. lol
Re: MFA fighter to get 10 years.....
Originally posted by Rogue Jedi
What do you guys think, is this MFA fighter extremely smart, or an asshead?
When i first read this story i wondered why the writer of the article even bothered to pose his structure around such a ridiculous question. Of course he is a fuking idiot. For one, he is a grown ass man. A grown ass man has no business taking up spirits in juvenile behavior. Secondly, it was a blatant stunt for attention. It isn't as though some nightstalker happened by and photographed buddy in the act. He wasn't caught by a London big brother-esque security camera. He taunted espn with the story. The writer is giving this guy more credit even if he does believe that dude is a brick head. The writer should flammed the dude for the idgit that he is and focused on the severity of the charges. The charges that this lame brain is facing is the only sympathetic aspect to the story. This shit is getting ridiculous. first Plaxico Burress get's ass raped after shooting HIMSELF with a legal but state legal firearm and now this bullshit. This guy kind of deserves everything that will come at him, other than the possibility of a slap on the wrist and a raise in popularity.
Originally posted by inimalist
lolboo, label the man an idiot for political disobedience
The article essentially spells out why the guy would have probably know what was up, it appears to be fairly obvious he was looking to make a point. Jeez, hate free expression a little more. Conformists.
Nah I didnt label him one for that... just his thinking of lack thereof in the instance is what garners him the idiot tag.
Nothing to do witht he the guy's agenda.
Yeah those organised anarchists have no sense of irony, it would seem.
Like those who "believe in Nihilism". 😛
Originally posted by inimalist
lolboo, label the man an idiot for political disobedience
The article essentially spells out why the guy would have probably know what was up, it appears to be fairly obvious he was looking to make a point. Jeez, hate free expression a little more. Conformists.
"Political disobedience" my right ass-cheek, all he did was debase property with graffiti, no different than the other idiots who write their "tags" with spray-paint.
He has the right to free expression; I'd support him in that, he doesn't have the right to ruin property that isn't his. He could have easily sprayed his little symbol on his house, car, shirt etc. and rebelled against the system; which of course, he is a part of, since it's likely he works, pays taxes, buys consumer goods etc. Anarchist, my left ass-cheek.
Originally posted by Grand-Moff-Gav
I think that it is a little mundane to assume that because anarchist object to centralised governmental control they should also be against the forming of associations to further their goals. Indeed it is to be expected, people working together for the greater good (as they see it).
Order is essentially the anti-anarchy equation, so they may work together for a common goal, anarchist they are not. Maybe the diet version of anarchist.
Originally posted by Rogue Jedi
The greater good.....
It is a matter of authority. Anarchists do not want faceless corporations and government bodies have authority over he people. However that does not preclude the possibility of people working together which ultimately is the utopian world from an Anarchist perspective.
Think of what association means- associates, a company of equals.
Anarchy is nothing to do with the absense of order. It is about removing superiors and rulers.
Originally posted by Grand-Moff-GavI gotcha.
It is a matter of authority. Anarchists do not want faceless corporations and government bodies have authority over he people. However that does not preclude the possibility of people working together which ultimately is the utopian world from an Anarchist perspective.Think of what association means- associates, a company of equals.
Anarchy is nothing to do with the absense of order.