Originally posted by Gideon
Irrelevant.I don't mind if people sling insults or act smug; Lord knows I'm guilty of much more than my fair share. The difference, however, is that when I am proven wrong, I will not conveniently step into the shadows unlike certain parties are notorious for doing. If you have the temerity to throw fists, you should have the balls to handle and acknowledge the legitimate retaliation.
That is the one thing that limits my respect for you. As far as you being smug goes, that's the rationale that I have. Even against you. You correct my grammar, and yet when we debate, you tend to be on the losing side. Should I be a prick to you endlessly and not acknowledge those times when you are right?
No.
I have admitted in the past that you have beat me in debates. And after the TJ debacle I have tried to scale it down.
But you know what? You are right. I am a prick sometimes.
That's kind of what the internet is for. When I'm in an actual conversation I try to eliminate it completely. In a debate though, I see no reason not to correct my opponent on every issue in which their position or terminology strays from the truth.
Originally posted by Gideon
And I believe you meant Subjekt "was" a greater authority than me, not "were." That wasn't the only time that I corrected you.
What do you mean? 🥷
(I did put 'my RW English teacher' in parenthesis incorrectly. True. But it was bait. I wouldn't have told you except that edit sniping you isn't nearly as fun as getting Faunus.)