Blade vs. Hellboy

Blade meets Hellboy in an abandoned vampire temple. Both of them are searching for a significant vampire relic that will aid them in the mission to defeat the nuisance that in the vampire curse.

Both of them want this relic. Only one can have it. The winner gets said prize.

Blade is, more or less, a killer. That's what he does. That's what he's good at.

Hellboy is not, per se, a killer, but he will do what has to be done on order to complete his assignment.

Blade has his Sword of the Daywalker, his stakes, and his pistol. Also, he is at full power since he has recently taken his serum.

Hellboy has the Enforcer (his big ass pistol), his Right Hand of Doom (duh), and his attitide.

Who takes this?

(I've included a poll: Should this be to the death? Do we need to use the morality clause?) The only reason I ask is because I would love to hear you guys' input.

As much as i like Hellboy i'd have to say that he loses. If Blade is Blood Raging i don't think there is much that Hellboy can do to Blade. Blade has all of the benefits of being a vampire with none of the side effects. This means that Hellboy's special bullets are going to be ineffective. The only way that Hellboy is going to down Blade is by lighting his surroundings on fire while keeping Blade from escaping. Hellboy could get a lucky shot on blade with his Gun giving him enough time to get close and smash Blades skull with his fist but otherwise Blade is to fast to strong and to durable. He will eventually cut Hellboy apart with his sword. Although, If Hellboy can Snap Blades sword with his fist that would shift the fight into his favor.

Blade showed some insane durability and speed feats (I believe at one point he reacted faster than a bullet, can't remember) feats in Trinity. His fight with the final dude was literally creating craters in the building.

Originally posted by Final Blaxican
Blade showed some insane durability and speed feats (I believe at one point he reacted faster than a bullet, can't remember) feats in Trinity. His fight with the final dude was literally creating craters in the building.

SPEED.

Hellboy has insane levels of durability, but I doubt he could last indefinitely against Blade's speed, as he had trouble in the first fight against the Elf.

With Morals, Id say Hellboy'd respect Blade and what he does enough not to fight and theyd team up..

Without morals, at some point the following day, Blade would be passed from Hellboy's colon, out his schincter, and into some nice cool liquid..

(No not really...
Im not clued up on these guys enough to comment seriously.)

Morals.

Why, Sadako. Why has this happened?

😂

I know....!!!!

Pure evil bought about by a relentless needer of copouts....!!!! ✅

Still rules is rules, though just means having to argue twice as many cases.

wanker

Originally posted by Rogue Jedi
wanker

You pinched out the turd while crying and gritting your teeth, now deal with the stench.

Originally posted by Rogue Jedi
wanker

Same to you only with suitably miniscule little wanking arcs.
Like you'd ever have the testicular fortitude to say that in person...

This ones for you, buddy.
www.youtube.com/watch?v=7GcVnhNjWV0

Well, Impediment made the call, he decided the morality clause was a good idea, so take it up with him.

I have no issue with him. He just did his job.
Nobody else who were pissed off by it blame him either.

But without you crying about it so much, he'd never have had to be in that position, would he...?

To think otherwise'd be like blaming the death of the child on the ambulancemen who attempted to save the kids life, rather than the driver of the car that hit her.

It would have eventually happened, just so happens I was around when it did.

Nobody had tried to subvert intelligent debate by calling it into question in a Vs thread before.
(certainly not enough to want to call for mod intervention)
It was your predisposal for irrelevancy in that argument that bought it up.

And to compound it, after vehemently fighting for the rule to subvert the thread further, your next thread you specify 'to the death'..

Originally posted by Sadako of Girth
Nobody had tried to subvert intelligent debate by calling it into question in a Vs thread before.
(certainly not enough to want to call for mod intervention)
It was your predisposal for irrelevancy in that argument that bought it up.

And to compound it, after vehemently fighting for the rule to subvert the thread further, your next thread you specify 'to the death'..

Jedi do not use dark side powers.

Leon has a saying of "no women no kids"

Batman does not kill.

Simple.

🙄 Nope that not what I was saying at all.

He does. He might not always mean it... But historically Batman has killed people. And he let Liam Neeson die in BB.

But the main point in a Violence based VS thread to argue restrict or handicap an opponent was low down weaselly tactics in abscence of a convincing argument, in that case..

Its like Gladiator where the Emporor refuses to fight Maximus without having first stabbed him like a punk before going out for the fight.

Cheap and nasty.

And it nullied most of the threads on here. Past present and future crapping up the whole section.
Thats why people were pissed.

He didn't KILL Liam, he merely left him to die, big difference.

Not morally speaking it isnt.

Did he die by Batman's hand? Did Batman administer the killing blow?