Blade vs. Hellboy

Ah but he had every chance to save him. And didnt.
Thusly he condemned Neeson to death.

Another example about how morals shit f**ks up threads.

Lets not allow it to do it to this thread too.
Its not just me thats expressed dismay/anger/disappointment at your actions, so just take it like a man and drop it for the good of the thread's as well as your own dignity's sakes, would be my advice..

Originally posted by Sadako of Girth
Ah but he had every chance to save him. And didnt.
Thusly he condemned Neeson to death.

Another example about how morals shit f**ks up threads.

Lets not allow it to do it to this thread too.
Its not just me thats expressed dismay/anger/disappointment at your actions, so just take it like a man and drop it for the good of the thread as well as your own dignity, would be my advice..

Fair enough.

And if you remember, I was pretty neutral to the matchup, I was asking questions about Mandalorian armor and Jango's jetpack, then it hit me, what about Batman's "I do not kill" code? I was just wondering if that would give Jango an edge, if any. I never meant for it to go as far as it did.

Then would you as the one who wanted it, ask for it to be repealed..?

It's not that I wanted it, It's just that all of a sudden it made sense, why not stay true to the movie character? And someone in the future starting a Batman thread is free to include it or not. It's not like Batman can never kill here.

In other words:
"No, because I voted it should stay."
or
"No, because I despite what I have just said, DO believe in it, after all."

If we stay that slavishly true to ethos of the characters, most would never fight anyhow.

Did "celebrity death match" ever worry about such small penised issues as these....? NO. And it rocked.

True. McClaine and Riggs would never fight, the first thing a cop does is ID himself, innit?

Yes.

Ive been asserting this for some time.

Then this is where the term "fantasy" comes into play.

Yes so that in the fantasy in question, an utterly fantasy-stomping concept be bought in is beyond needlessly intrusive and sucks the fun out of it.

Originally posted by Sadako of Girth
Yes so that in the fantasy in question, an utterly fantasy-stomping concept be bought in is beyond needless...?

Nope. Episodes of "The Bill" are for that sort of thing.
...Or "Hill Street Blues" reruns.

F*** that morals shit.

Let Ghandi tear them apart with his bare teeth, if need be.

"THERE CAN BE ONLY ONE...........!!!!!!!!"

(obviously though, Ghandi is stll restricted to what a man of his size and conditioning and even skills could do etc.... Im not talking about completely abandoning reality here, of course)

😖hifty:

😛

**** me, I had a great idea for a versus thread and lost it.

It'll come back to ya.

Originally posted by Rogue Jedi
More like an option. You gotta admit, wouldn't it be far more entertaining to watch Batman apprehend Jango instead of simply killing him?

Why wouldn't Jango in turn not use deadly force as Batman, since he's a bounty-hunter and would logically be going after Batman for a subdue and capture?

See the one-sidedness of bringing in "morals" in that particular Vs match was?

P.S. Watch Dune, it's worth the time invested.

Originally posted by Sadako of Girth
Not morally speaking it isnt.