Blade vs. Hellboy

Originally posted by Robtard
Why wouldn't Jango in turn not use deadly force as Batman, since he's a bounty-hunter and would logically be going after Batman for a subdue and capture?

See the one-sidedness of bringing in "morals" in that particular Vs match was?

See the beauty of it now?

Originally posted by Rogue Jedi
See? the thread starter can SPECIFY this, he can SPECIFY whether Jango is trying to kill Batman or deliver him for bounty.

See the beauty of it now?

Sorry, I don't see.

Originally posted by Impediment
As per my own rule about following film canon, my thread about Batman (from The Dark Knight) versus Boba Fett (from Empire) was rather droll due to the fact that Boba didn't do much of anything on screen. Much of Boba's notoriety came from novelizations of the EU. I feel that this can be a thriving thread, or, ultimately, can be a disaster.

Take the same scenario:

Batman has home field advantage. The fight is in Gotham City.

Jango Fett (from Ep. II) has all of his gear and weapons that were present during the fight against Obi Wan. Slave I is not present during this fight.

Batman (from The Dark Knight) has all of his weapons and the Batpod.

Can the Caped Crusader hold his own against Jango Fett?

And before any of you say "D00d, Jango would pwn Batman for teh sure.", just look at what Obi Wan does during the fight, and he doesn't even have near the fighting skills of Bats. (Although, I will admit, he does have the power of The Force at his disposal.)

Can you show me what I'm supposed to be seeing?

I dont either. Why over complicate it...?
It just turns into 'a clusterf**k' as you put it.
Its not meant to be role play, is it...?
Its meant to be a "who is the more capable in combat" thread.

Makes for more than a one dimensional convo, IMO.

Well, you're a one dimensional guy. 😉

Seriously though.. There are already many dimensions, the various aspects, there are lots of hypothetical scenarios and stuff to keep it interesting.

Otherwise the otherwise fun thread is just paralysed in bureaucracy and irrelevancies/get out clauses.

Another thing...Let's say it is established that Jango pwns Batman in this scenario. Well, instead of the thread ending, we can THEN consider what might happen if Jango were trying to "apprehend" Batman alive.

Thats different. That comes under the "Different scenarios" I addressed.

But f***ing with a 'Who is the better in combat'/'mightier' VS thread by interjecting with irrevelavancy concerning the personal politics of the characters is bullshit.

Who the character is kinda defines how they fight.

Well yeah they should otherwise be character accurate but having the no kill moral is the one that is the stander outer of shit ideas.

What the **** does janga fett and batman have to do with this thread ?

They are moaning because a new morality rule has been introduced. Like say, Batman cant kill because his movie character does not kill.

Fun fact: Batman killed Harvey Dent.

Then why are people discussing two face maybe being in the next Batman?

They're stupid?

It would be retarded to bring him back.

How did he die again?

Batman pushed him and he fell, and died.

haermm

Awesome. 😄 That wraps that one up then.
Batman owns Jango by pushing. 😛

Back to Hellboy though...

haermm