Originally posted by Darth Truculent
Sion vs Ventress - Sion
Sion vs Fisto - Sion due to his ability to tolerate pain
Sion vs Darth Maul - Maul because of his mastery of lightsaber
Sion vs Dooku - Dooku because of his superior mastery of the Force
Sion vs Zannah - Tie: Zannah would freak him out with her mastery of Sith Sorcery, but Sion can tolerate pain and mental torture to a certain degree.Overall Sion, was a powerful, but not that powerful Sith Lord. He relied too much on the darkside to keep him living rather than being to fully capitalize it's power. The Exile lost round one to him on Korriban, but somewhat pawned him at Malachor. She used reverse psychology, not her physical or lightsaber abilities to defeat him.
Firstly, I'll give a big 'No' in response to your 'Sions vs Ventress - Sion'.
Secondly, I'll give another, but bigger, 'NO' to the second part of your post.
Sion realized he would never be able to defeat the Exile. In case you don't remember, you (as the Exile) knock the shit out the rotting corpse, like, what? Four times in a row? Three? And only then, the idiot realized he's too effin' weak to defeat her. Before that, he just basically said all she was saying is bullshit.
Yeah, effective use of reverse psychology right there.
The Exile struck him down four times yes, but he regenerated himself. The Exile convinced him to let go of his hatred and give up the Force. If you forget, The Exile survived ten years without the Force and the Force was the only thing that kept Sion alive.
Ventress wasn't strong in the Force, just a very very good lightsaber artist. Sion would have pawned her easily.
How did he "regenerate" himself truculent? Where was it stated?
We don't know how exactly he was "defeated" each time thanks to the gameplay mechanics.
Hell going by that i guess vrook can "regenerate" because his health bar keeps popping back to full everytime he "gets struck down".
^ Gameplay nuh uh.
Originally posted by Darth Truculent
The Exile struck him down four times yes, but he regenerated himself. The Exile convinced him to let go of his hatred and give up the Force. If you forget, The Exile survived ten years without the Force and the Force was the only thing that kept Sion alive.Ventress wasn't strong in the Force, just a very very good lightsaber artist. Sion would have pawned her easily.
Ventress was pretty strong in the force. She was great with tk.
Originally posted by Publius II
When did Maul "fully develop" his Force abilites?And when did the title of Sith start to matter in a versus scenario?
Maybe he misplaced a comma:
"Ventress didn't fully develop her Force abilities, like Maul." It's wordy but sounds like the sort of comparison DT would try to make.
The title started to affect vs. fights when Caedus "FAILD TO BCUM TEH SITH LORDZ" and thus was proven inferior to Revan. Didn't you get the memo?
YouTube video
"Why so serious son?"
1:12
It is kind of indistinct but it is the only word that makes sense within the context. Suck it! (😛)
Originally posted by Darth Truculent
Ventress didn't fully develop her Force abilities like Maul. She was just a very good lightsaber artist - like Maul. Besides, she was only a Sith minion - not a true Sith.
Well she almost managed to crush a powerful jedi master's heart. She also tore massive chunks from a roof with the force. She had the basics pretty down packed. Yoda even stated she was strong, but not as strong as he.
Originally posted by Red NemesisI'm sorry, all I hear is an elongated "s". Like "serious-suh."
YouTube video
"Why so serious son?"1:12
It is kind of indistinct but it is the only word that makes sense within the context. Suck it! (😛)
It's hard to write.
Just because you are strong in the Force doesn't mean you're all powerful. A senior padawan can tear down massive rocks.
Galen Marek, although not a true Sith or Jedi pulled a SD to the ground. He was far stronger than Ventress, but I'm getting off topic.
Okay, Ventress nearly did kill a Master, but failed because she hadn't fully developed her skills. Maul killed a Master because of his superior ability with the lightsaber and teras kasi martial arts. Ventress may have been strong in the Force, but was not fully trained.
Originally posted by Darth TruculentSurprise!
Just because you are strong in the Force doesn't mean you're all powerful. A senior padawan can tear down massive rocks.
Galen Marek, although not a true Sith or Jedi pulled a SD to the ground. He was far stronger than Ventress, but I'm getting off topic.
Okay, Ventress nearly did kill a Master, but failed because she hadn't fully developed her skills.Ventress had killed seventeen Jedi as of DR; Padawans, Knights, and Masters. Maul killed... two?
Originally posted by Darth TruculentWhat point are you trying to make? You said Ventress was not that strong in the force, and i pointed out where you were wrong. Ventress was both strong and skilled in the force.
Just because you are strong in the Force doesn't mean you're all powerful. A senior padawan can tear down massive rocks.
Galen Marek, although not a true Sith or Jedi pulled a SD to the ground. He was far stronger than Ventress, but I'm getting off topic.
Okay, Ventress nearly did kill a Master, but failed because she hadn't fully developed her skills. Maul killed a Master because of his superior ability with the lightsaber and teras kasi martial arts. Ventress may have been strong in the Force, but was not fully trained.Yet she was stronger than some "fully trained" Jedi masters. She also demonstrated more combat skill with the force than Sion.