Originally posted by Borbarad
Proof? ^^
A great deal, actually. And it is beginning to be compiled here:
Originally posted by Gideon
A great deal, actually. And it is beginning to be compiled here:
crikey...quite the essay there...
Originally posted by Gideon
A great deal, actually. And it is beginning to be compiled here:
Excusez-moi, Garçon.
I think you're a little bit confused. I ordered a plate of hard-boiled proof. What you served is a mixed salad consisting of raw analyses, soft-boiled interpretations and tenderized speculations soaked in fanboy-sauce. While that might be decent dinner for the plebeians usually eating in your nice restaurant "Ferme ta Geulle", it's not approbiate to serve that stuff to somebody like myself.
So would you please be so kind and tumble back into the kitchen to tell to the Maître de Cuisine how that entrée has to be dressed? A small hint: To get "hard-boiled proof" he would need to fetch a nice cup of "formal proof" or "derivation", which he probably doesn't have at hand. An alternative would be to use a soupçon of deductive reasoning. Yet, as we all know, in deductive argument can only be valid if the conclusion follows necessarily or logically from equally valid premises (in case it should be sound). Your maître apparently attempts to put the cart before the horse, metaphorically speaking, because he starts with the desired conclusion and then maculates the countertop with all ingredients that seem to fit his idea, while ignoring the rest of the recipe.
The result, of course, is a rather tasteless dogma-soup. And in that special case, the one responsible should probably leave that work to the professionals of the Roman Catholic Church. They have at least practiced to prepare that delightful delicacy for more than 1,500 years. And even they have their critics, which aren't fond of that menu for an acquired taste.
I have to give you credit, Nai. You and the rest of EoD's founding members have certainly made an art form of excuses. The bottom line is that your word, and understand me completely when I say this, is irrelevant. It has been for quite some time, and I imagine it will continue to be that way in the years to come.
That essay, brilliantly written and researched, is the culmination of every pro-Palpatine argument ever made. It is written from the premise of proving that he is the most powerful Force user ever. If you don't like it, well that's fine. You never did like that epiphany that he was much stronger than the ancient Sith and Dooku, did you?
The bottom line that despite your unsubstantiated complaints and criticisms, the essay still stands. Consider my end in this debate (the burden of proof) met.
I happily take your concession.
Originally posted by Nephthys
Mmmmmm, I love it when you're all dominant like this Gid. duroolio
So does Nai. He's a glutton for punishment. He has a fetish for being on the receiving end of humiliation and defeat.
You're not alone, my child.
Ik, I've been spending too much time around Faunus. 😘
That never bodes well. I'd suggest being on your guard and not bringing any food near him.
Originally posted by Eminence
Why would he (I thought Exodus was a girl; something to do with calling Revan "she" all the time) "know" me better than anyone else here?No sense do you make.
Two words, my friend: anal sex. When you two (and by that I mean you and Exodus) reach that stage, you pretty much know one another.