Originally posted by leonheartmm1. Not really. I am considered to be quite intelligent by people wherever I go. 🙂 While it is true they do not support my argument, they tend to get you riled up which makes me happy. I am very well aware of what a no-limits fallacy is. You, are clearly not. It in fact DOES have to be used to justify infinites, that is what makes it a no-limits fallacy. You continuously ride me on my age, referring to me as a kid or child...When my intellect is on a much grander scale than your's.
considered smart? sum1's a little delusional. and your claim concerning my image does nothing to support ur argument or ur claim to intelligence. you dont know what a no limit fallacy is, seeing as you dont know that it doesnt always have to be used to justify infinites. again, dont try to lecture ME on fallacies. and i wasnt attacking ur age, i was attacking ur stupidity.go back and re read., that is not what i was doing at all. i was using a>b reasoning.
again, u prove that you know little about fallacies or deductive reasoning. lets turn around and look at the other side "alex has the power to consume said SUPERhuman whose durability against such an attack has never been tested" they are BOTH claims of a possible phenomenon occuring, NEITHER has positive evidence or PRECEDENCE to back them up. as such there are no positives on either side and the argument is at a standstill until either side proves their premise. negetive evidence fallacy doesnt apply here no matter how many linguistic tricks one uses to rephrase the argument.
more durable than ground zero of the ray sphere activation? not by a long shot. inverse square law
yet he DOES summone lightening from the sky later one which lasts for a long time and can be controlled by the sixaxis. btw. and what are you TALKING about, a single AVERAGE lightening strike has the power of 11 gigawats, while a super hot lightening strike has around 300 gigawatts of power {todd livingstone} , {similar to cole summoning lightening}, the total ENERGY is not in the gigajoule range because lightening strikes last only for milliseconds or even micro seconds, its only the plasma we see with remains longer. now if 300 gigawats were to go on for a MINUTE your looking at 18 TERRAJOULES!!!!!! so please, stop with ur stupidity. and yes, use the inverse square law multplied by alex's exposed surface are and see just how little of the actual energy he suffers at even 100 metres.
you were mocking my claim with gameplay mechanics. nuthing to do with english, everything to do with idiotic debating tactics. now stop benig rude.
2. ...That is the same fvcking thing you idiot.
3. First of all, please stop using Cole's superhuman status as a point for him resisting consumption. Alex has consumed many a superhuman, and it is feats that count. Cole has none to back up him resisting being impaled and consumed by the hundreds of tendrils which span half a city block or more, impale military vehicles with ease, and can devour superhumans. I have brought up evidence. You have yet to.
4. Absorption. Not durability. Also, the fact that I did not catch this when you first said it and needed someone else to makes me feel like a complete idiot. You kept raging on and on about how the only reason lightning does not kill humans is because our conductivity dampens the strike...Why isn't the same thing going to happen to Alex? Who is already hundreds of times more durable than a human mind you.
5. Never contested he could summon lightning from the sky. Livingston did say a "mega strike" can reach up to 300 gigawatts, yes, but that is very rare and shows up in winter storms. Looking up a more credible source, it is 11 gigawatts. But guess what? As far as orders of magnitude go, the average THUNDERSTORM(Not single lightning strike) releases 3.6 terrajoules of energy. The approximate yield of Little Boy, was 6.3 terrajoules. Using some more retard math, the yield of the bomb Alex dropped, directly stated to be ten times more powerful than that, was 63 terrajoules. So even at a fvcking FOURTH, the energy is more than twice that of a thunderstorm, let alone a friggin lightning bolt. Also, do you care to calculate the amount of the yield Alex was hit with?
I don't.
6. You know, I'll actually man up and admit that. I apologise.