Originally posted by I am who I am
I DO NOT mean that cuz Gill is the boss that's why he is illegal. Simply put. You used Gill as an excuse as to why 3rd Strike is unbalanced. I said Gill doesn't count, that's not a valid excuse. You can not pick him at the arcade, at tourneys, or on Live. I simply said that he was like most other bosses from most other fightin' games. He is super powered purposely thus you can't even pick him even if you wanted to. That's all I'm sayin'. I hope you can wrap your head around that.
I understand your point quite well. Unfortunately, it is not relevant...which is why I suggested we drop it. Your pursuing this was ignoratio elenchi as of your second reply to me. Leave it.
Originally posted by I am who I am
Yes Ken is better than Sean but not as horribly as you make it sound. It's not Servebot VS Cable in MVC2. That is my point. That's all I'm sayin'.
I never compared it to any characters other than Heart and Saki. I simply stated that Ken is superior to Sean. You saw hyperbole I did not make.
Originally posted by I am who I am
To be honest I don't care if you think AH is better than SF. I don't and we all have our opinions. I'm not gonna go on about AH cuz just knowin' about that game as a young man makes me sound like a weirdo. But that's just ME.
I agree, we can not truly determine which is better. I posted that hopefully to make you realize how rediculous arguing about that would be. You apparently realize this, so we can drop this too.
Originally posted by I am who I am
So what that AH is more balanced than SFIII cuz they made the game more times. It takes more than EXTREME balance to make a good game. Sean and Ken aint the BEST match up but it aint a stomp for anybody if they are at similar skill levels. Do you get me?OMG, we know Ken and the gang are a cut above the rest, but not enough to call the game "Unbalanced". Er game has a tier list. You make it sound like, if a game has a tier list then it's unbalanced. You can't have complete balance and a tier list at the same time. SFIII is not the most balanced fighter ever, but it's not so unbalanced that it's worth mentioning like you did. If it were it wouldn't be so big er EVO tourney, Even after 10yrs.[/
I have maintained that a skilled player can win in the game regardless. Still, I showed how a select few are disproportionately represented at the highest levels. Yes, it can be quite popular in spite of that. Look at Marvel vs Capcom 2 for an even more extreme example of a popular yet unbalanced game.
Originally posted by I am who I am
As for the rest of that shit you posted, which I don't get what your tryin' to show me (you say somthin like a word document). I NEVER SAID those 3 were not at the top. The best players in the world are pickin' the highest tiered characters o'course. But you are makin' it sound like they are the ONLY ONES ALL THE TIME. Other good players use other characters. Some of those guys have won more than once and I have been a member at Shoryuken.com (i already know ALL results for ALL tourneys so there is nothin you can show me about my favorite fightin' game that I don't already know) for along time and many of us say it still hearkens back to peeps seein' the best fighter win wit certain characters and then others pick'em cuz they think they are the best.
Again, I point out that you are putting words in my mouth comrade. I never said they are the only characters who ever win tournaments. You said that only "noobs" use the 3rd Strike Trio. I merely demonstrated that they
factually dominate at the highest levels of play. We appear to be in agreement here now.
Originally posted by I am who I am
All and all no game is perfectly balanced but you are puttin' 3rd Strike in a MVC2 category. And I'm tellin' you that it aint that bad. I hope this clears things up.
It does clear it up. We are actually in agreement about everything else. This was the main problem. I
never likened 3rd Strike to Marvel vs Capcom 2. That would be rediculous. I only claimed that it is still unbalanced. I just wonder why you refuse to use the word "unbalanced" when you acknowledge the dominance of those characters.
It does not mean the game is bad. It does not mean it's unplayable. It just means it has some balance issues. Many games do.
Originally posted by TricksterPriest
Seth, Gouken and Gouki do not deserve a ban. The only one who might be debatable is Gouken, and that remains to be seen.Gouki&Seth have the severe stamina deficit to make up for their extreme power. Not to mention the SGS is harder to use in this game, and Seth's Tanden Storm doens't actually do that much damage in comparison to other ultras.
I also strongly believe Seth's shoryuken does not have fireball immunity.
Oh, I agree with you completely. I think the problem is that not all organizers play the games themselves. This is understandable as throwing large events is quite a task. Unfortunately, these organizers may not know what the tournament standard is for some of the games and must rely on the players to provide that information. This leads to situations like I mentioned earlier.
Originally posted by Mr.Biscuits
Also that Arcana being better than SF comment was pretty hilarious.
I live in NY where we have/had the biggest Arcana scene. I saw a lot of high level play and even the players didn't enjoy it much.
Hilarious because it's true? No but seriously, there is no way to determine that much to my dismay. I posted up above my purpose for that comment.