Originally posted by Voyeur
First I need to establish some things it seems. One being, please go back and read each word of the original post I made.Majora explodes. You see him in the video start to break apart and become no more and a burst of Light/Energy. The room that the final battle takes place is still physically in tact when Majora begins this, and while he is already fallen and broken into pieces from the Light. While the room is reacting physically by shaking, rumbling, pieces of the ceiling are falling down. The signs of an eruption, as the cliche silent 'boom' goes. Now you see the top of the moon start to break off into pieces, crumble, the same way the energy and Light affected Majora, it seems to have the energy and power now to destroy a physical existed moon that was brought out of orbit.
"and the moon that spelled doom for Clock Town will be no more."-Canon quote.
so the moon is 100% no more.
So there is what you see in the video right? And there is the quote. So, you see the moon physically start to be torn apart by that light so forth. Then later you see Link having to awake, meaning some sort of force was put on him to put him in that state. Be it the blast or that he hit the ground.
the moon did not explode. Or more or less not in the sense that you people think of explosions. Bombs, fireworks and shit. From there it is pretty simple to fill in the blanks and connect the dots. Even with out me having to shove physics down your guys' throats, I think you can tell what is going on. Watch the video again, and stop being narrow minded.
I read it perfectly fine.
I never said that the moon was still there, i simply said that you have no proof that it exploded, which that quote does not prove. I dont really care if the moon was no more, just that you cant prove it exploded.
Your second paragraph is the exact same thing youve been doing this whole time, theories and speculation. Its not proof. Im not being narrow minded, your using your knowledge of "what could have happened" and claiming them as fact. Its simply that you do not get the definition of proof.
Originally posted by lootic
So how did you think the theories of nature was made, by watching only, lol, NO, its done by sometimes guessing with things that seems to fit in the puzzle. Tell me how to prove the big bang theory other than that it explains a lot of how the universe works or maybe even the evolution theroy, nope darwin didnt know there were genes but somehow these thories can predict some things.We need to come to an agreement of what happened and there is no doubt the moon has a pocket universe since I cant see any green fields on top of the moon and inside the moon there could not be this infinite blue sky(Its night when you enter the moon also). so pocket universe no doubt. What happens exactly when majora dies is an intresting question. The pocket universe exploding is very likely since there is particles left after the destruction of the moon and link is not sent downwards to clock town but in some other direction to the termina field.
Its not as much as nintendo says so(there is very little such things, lol, that maybe why link is so underrated) as the actual thing that happened.
the key word in your first sentence is
theory, not fact, which voyuer trying to claim his words as. Anything about genes, shown as fact, have proof to back them up. Darwin probably started out as speculation and theories, but never claimed them as fact until he could prove them. You seem smart, so answer me this. Can you
prove the moon exploded, i mean give me actual proof, not yours or voyeurs little theories of what may have happened, and if you cant then it means nothing in this debate.
Originally posted by ScreamPaste
The biggest problem with debating for Link is Nintendo avoids saying things directly, so that they can retcon it later, just incase, and also because they know that the constant quest for knowledge keeps the fans interested. They also very rarely use cut scenes for anything except forwarding the plot. It's just part of their 'gameplay first' M.O. Still, they give us enough to work with. The moon WAS destroyed, that is clear, and Link was exposed to the same forces, whatever they were, the simplest explanation is an explosion. [And the simplest is usually the best.] It'd also be the least impressive for Link to survive.
No one was arguing the moon was destroyed, just how it was destroyed. You and i both know im not an idiot. I may not be the smartest one here at kmc, but i do understand things. So if simplest explanations are the "best" ones, then why is it so hard for me, jaxx, and terry to understand voyuers "theories"? And how come it took voyuer multiple long posts explaining it? Its simple: everything he is saying
is not a fact. If its not proven, then it cant be used. You do know the difference between a theory and a fact, dont you?
Originally posted by LLLLLink
Link is practically built for taking down guys like Dante.
Link wins the same way he wins against Sephiroth, Kratos, and anyone else. I get tired of typing it out.
I honestly have no idea on what to say to this.