ALbert Wesker (pre Boroboris) vs. Raiden

Originally posted by ThunderGodEneru
I'm doing research for my other post, so I'll answer this one in the mean-time.

The first was blatant PIS.

I'm willing to believe that.

The second is the same reason why cities and countries do not get destroyed when Superman Prime fights, it is an inconstistency.

An inconsistency that is consistant?

I could moan and b!tch to you that Wesker could not even kill a normal human like Chris Redfield in a punch despite his steel punching feats, yet I do not.

And that's because unlike you I can prove why not.

He can kill Chris in one hit, and he tries to do so later, however every time he gets ready for the killing blow he is distracted or stopped somehow. Otherwise he spends most of his time, according to him himself "wasting time", with his opponents. He suffers from egotistical bad guy syndrome.

So going by the bullshit logic I cannot believe you used in this post,

Immtiation is such flattery.

Originally posted by niduin
i cant beleive i am doing this. but i did watch both the videos where raiden fought vamp and he never hit him in the face. also even if he did it wouldnt necesaraly make him go flying, that all depends on the speed at which he hits him with, i mean you can get hit by a car going 1/2 mph thats still lots of presure but its going really slow and you wont go flying back. but if its going 60 you would flip like a ragdoll

No.

ok so your saying that catching a ball that is thrown at 30 mph is more impresive than catching 30 balls moving at 15 mph in 2 seconds?

I would say that deflecting five of those 15 balls and then stepping to the side to avoid the reaming 13 is less impressive than catching two 30 MPH balls.

cuz that vulcan cannon you were talking about, it shoots 6000 rounds per minut, thats 100 a second, so yeah i think its a little harder to deflect all those than...well anything else

Except Raiden never deflects "all those". He deflects the five or six that manage to come close to hitting him and dodges the rest.

yeah thats true, however thats not the reason that the .50 cal is fast, its just because it has lots of gunpowder behind it

Which is off-set by the fact that they're huge, so having lots of gunpowder doesn't matter. There are smaller bullets that move faster.

Doesn't matter. Prove they were 50. caliber bullets?

oh yeah your right using every mustle in your body to hold up thousands upon thousands of TONS

He wasn't holding it up. He was holding back the momentum. Don't get it twisted. There's a big difference between keeping a person from moving forward and lifting them up.

yeah because he used his entire body to do something like that means that he cant be strong enough to do lots of tamage with a punch i mean thats only a portion of the strength used to stop more weight than i can even fathom.

You're ignoring variables. Like water. Tugboats that use the same sized engines you find in trucks pull Carrier ships across water. The water alone supports about 75% of the weight of a carrier. So if it's really 90+ tons then in reality only about 20-30 tons of it made a difference.

who cares if he "had leverage" or "used his whole body"

And this is why you don't have an argument.

I concede the debate because I researched for an hour and could not find out how fast a 12.7 millimeter bullet from an automatic weapon flies.

It was inevitable, sir.

If it makes you feel better. You still provide the best head around.

Originally posted by Final Blaxican
It was inevitable, sir.

If it makes you feel better. You still provide the best head around.

Sir, I think we both know you are the sheep in the relationship.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/12.7x108mm

"Bullet weight/type Velocity Energy
52.0 g (802 gr) API B32 860 m/s (2,800 ft/s) 19,230 J (14,180 ft·lbf)"

😉

Heh......

You're a dick for finding that so easily.

But now I can make my reply, shall do it later. Don't much feel like it now.

Wkipedia? lol.

..Does anyone here have any reason to vandalise a page about a specific bullet to such an extent that it matches the speeds listed for every gun that uses that bullet on all of wikipedia?

o_O I understand it's not the best source evar(tm) but we're debating VG versus, wiki is good enough, imo.

I don't actually have a problem with it, I'm just dissing you because you're black.

Playin' the race card, eh? I see how it is.. Q-Q

Originally posted by Final Blaxican
No.

Originally posted by Final Blaxican

Except Raiden never deflects "all those". He deflects the five or six that manage to come close to hitting him and dodges the rest.

Originally posted by Final Blaxican

Which is off-set by the fact that they're huge, so having lots of gunpowder doesn't matter. There are smaller bullets that move faster.

Originally posted by Final Blaxican

He wasn't holding it up. He was holding back the momentum. Don't get it twisted. There's a big difference between keeping a person from moving forward and lifting them up.

Originally posted by Final Blaxican

You're ignoring variables. Like water. Tugboats that use the same sized engines you find in trucks pull Carrier ships across water. The water alone supports about 75% of the weight of a carrier. So if it's really 90+ tons then in reality only about 20-30 tons of it made a difference.

who said it was 90+ tons, we are talking 50-90 thousand tons, stop making stuff up

Originally posted by Final Blaxican
It was inevitable, sir.

If it makes you feel better. You still provide the best head around.

You don't make any sense.

what isnt make any sence and ill explain it to you. my last post i was extremely tired and i dont know what i was trying to prove, but the one before that i think i was prety clear

i still dont get what doesnt make sence, i wish you would tell me so i could explain