Originally posted by Original Smurph
And yet you advocate using feats...Feats that are taken directly from comic fights...
Comic fights where anything can happen...
Anything, such as incredibly off-base, inconsistent feats....
HMMMMMM
Makky's lead us all to the brilliant conclusion that debating comics is pointless. Good timing, what with the forum closing. Everybody thank Makky on your way out of KMC.
No he advocates going by the high-end feats like, you know, in the rules. What you advocate, however well meaning, results in nothing but "Whatever character I want to win wins because I say so."
Superman vs. the Hulk. Hey Superman doesn't use his speed all the time. There are stories where he doesn't use it. And the Hulk did break that planet that one time. There you go, Hulk wins 'cause that's the result I want.
And that is basically all debates here are and always will be as long as the rules are only peripherally enforced at best.
I suppose we could go with the lowest showings of every character but I doubt most people want to do that.
We could go with "average" showings which seems to be more what you might advocate but the problem is "average showing" becomes whatever the debater wants it to be to get the win for his favorite.
High-end feats are the only way you're ever going to get all the characters involved in the fight on a level playing field without bias in favor of a certain character. I'd prefer it be about what the characters are shown to be capable of rather than getting a majority opinion in favor of a character, an opinion that is meaningless if it doesn't evaluate both characters by the same standards.