The clone wars republic vs old republic, sith empire and Infinite Empire

Originally posted by Hewhoknowsall
WTF????? Are you even reading what I wrote? Or are you just playing dumb to annoy me? I said that it is UNlikely - not likely - but UNlikely that Kopez > Yoda, infact I said that it is more likely that it's the difference in tech and not in skill level of Kopez/Yoda that caused it. READ MY POST

Notice this:

a) Quordis >>>> Yoda (UNLIKELY, SINCE HE GOT BEATEN BY BANE)

Hmmmm......

Hypocrite

Yoda>>>Kopecz. And Qordis, and Kaan. "Greatest foe", "PT Jedi=#1" and all that.

You're still not very good at this game.

No, he was using Quordis (kopecz?) >>>> Yoda to make the other 'options' he presented more effective.

I try not to use filler dishonestly but if he needs it to make a point, more power to him. That it won't work probably won't stop him.

(Yoda < [Sith Lord] is so untrue that it makes the other choices more persuasive. In theory. In practice it just makes him look like a dumbass.)

Originally posted by Red Nemesis
No, he was using Quordis (kopecz?) >>>> Yoda to make the other 'options' he presented more effective.

I try not to use filler dishonestly but if he needs it to make a point, more power to him. That it won't work probably won't stop him.

(Yoda < [Sith Lord] is so untrue that it makes the other choices more persuasive. In theory. In practice it just makes him look like a dumbass.)

I SAID that it's UNlikely and therefore the only possible explanation that I can think of is that the droids' weapons are far superior. You are SEVERELY twisting my words. Why am I a dumbass by saying that it's unlikely (aka untrue)? It's true that the statement that Quordis/Kopez/any sith except for Sidious > Yoda IS TOTALLY FALSE, and I was saying that it was false (which is the right answer), NOT that it was true. So I'm a dumbass by stating the exact same thing that you said?

Originally posted by Lord Lucien
Maybe you're just f*cking up your typing, but in case (and most likely) that you aren't:

Yoda>>>Kopecz. And Qordis, and Kaan. "Greatest foe", "PT Jedi=#1" and all that.

You're still not very good at this game.

Yes, Yoda >>> (insert any dark lord) which is basically WHAT I SAID. I said that it's unlikely (aka untrue) that that Yoda > Quordis/Kopez/whatever, so you are basically arguing with someone that has the SAME OPINION AS YOU.

(please respond to everything I say and not just the little stuff)

Originally posted by Hewhoknowsall
I SAID that it's UNlikely and therefore the only possible explanation that I can think of is that the droids' weapons are far superior. You are SEVERELY twisting my words. Why am I a dumbass by saying that it's unlikely (aka untrue)? It's true that the statement that Quordis/Kopez/any sith except for Sidious > Yoda IS TOTALLY FALSE, and I was saying that it was false (which is the right answer), NOT that it was true. So I'm a dumbass by stating the exact same thing that you said?

Yes, Yoda >>> (insert any dark lord) which is basically WHAT I SAID. I said that it's unlikely (aka untrue) that that Yoda > Quordis/Kopez/whatever, so you are basically arguing with someone that has the SAME OPINION AS YOU.

(please respond to everything I say and not just the little stuff)

Oh God, especially this one:

Originally posted by Hewhoknowsall
And yes, GAR wins. In PoD, a sith lord (too lazy to find name, since I read it a while ago, but it was Quordis or something) encountered a squad of the republics MOST ELITE soldiers that they could muster. After the fight, Quordis said that they were really good, so good that one even got in 2 shots before he killed them all. When Yoda fights battle droids (who aren't nearly as skilled as the upper elite soldiers), they manage to get in way more than 1 shot at him. This means:

a) Quordis >>>> Yoda (unlikely, he got beaten easily by Bane)
b) Old republic era soldiers weren't that well trained (unlikely, and that would work in GAR's favor so it would help them anyway)
c) The blasters weren't as advanced/high rate of fire (likely, given the 2000 year time gap)J
d) other

Why did you end your paragraph with "This means:" and follow it up with "Quordis>>>>Yoda..."? The corresponding statement in brackets makes it sound like you were justifying the assessment, instead of arguing against it.

It actually took several days and a dozen intermittent posts for your meaning to get through. I get it NOW, but Christ man you have to do something about your little... problem.

Originally posted by Lord Lucien
Do you see now the necessity to type in a coherent and effective manner using proper grammar and spelling? Ever since you started here your arguments have been negated by your own poor use of the English language's sentence format.

Oh God, especially this one:

Why did you end your paragraph with "This means:" and follow it up with "Quordis>>>>Yoda..."? The corresponding statement in brackets makes it sound like you were justifying the assessment, instead of arguing against it.

It actually took several days and a dozen intermittent posts for your meaning to get through. I get it NOW, but Christ man you have to do something about your little... problem.

when I did a) b) c) d) choices, that meant that it could be one of the 4, just like multiple choice questions. And the brackets say that it's UNLIKELY.

And can we get back to the topic on hand?

CW Republic wins. They had better tech and better trained troops.

Originally posted by Hewhoknowsall
when I did a) b) c) d) choices, that meant that it could be one of the 4, just like multiple choice questions. And the brackets say that it's UNLIKELY.

Originally posted by Lord Lucien
What you said in the brackets makes sense with additional explanation. If you need to explain the explanation then it was poorly written.

OK, so maybe I did use improper grammer. But just by reading the brackets you can figure out that the brackets aren't supporting the fact and are infact stating that they're unlikely. So even if it may be a bit confusing, once you READ you should be able to figure out. But instead, you try to act like as if you don't in a sarcastic manner and waste several posts pretending that something is confusing you, or it really is confusing you, which would be weird.

Now please, who do you side with (GAR vs team) and why?

I got it the first time.

I'm smarter than Lucien and Nemesis, so I win moar.

Originally posted by Hewhoknowsall
OK, so maybe I did use improper grammer. But just by reading the brackets you can figure out that the brackets aren't supporting the fact and are infact stating that they're unlikely. So even if it may be a bit confusing, once you READ you should be able to figure out. But instead, you try to act like as if you don't in a sarcastic manner and waste several posts pretending that something is confusing you, or it really is confusing you, which would be weird.

Originally posted by Hewhoknowsall
Now please, who do you side with (GAR vs team) and why?

Originally posted by Eminence
I got it the first time.

I'm smarter than Lucien and Nemesis, so I win moar.

I got it before I read it.

Me > You > RN and TG. God, I love A>B>C.

Originally posted by Slash_KMC
I got it before I read it.

Me > You > RN and TG. God, I love A>B>C.

Originally posted by Lord Lucien
And me>Barack Obama. Goddang boys.

I'll second that.

Dooku outdueled Mace in spars.

Qui Gon tied Mace in spars.

Obi Wan > Anakin > Dooku > Mace > Sidious = Yoda

Obi Wan is supreme!!!! Yoda is wrong: Obi Wan > Sidious

Maul > Qui Gon = Mace

Maul > Mace!

TPM Obi Wan > Maul > Qui Gon = Mace

TPM Obi Wan > Mace!

Yeah!

Anyway, who thinks that the team wins? Can anyone give an argument?

Originally posted by Hewhoknowsall
Dooku outdueled Mace in spars.

Qui Gon tied Mace in spars.

Obi Wan > Anakin > Dooku > Mace > Sidious = Yoda

Obi Wan is supreme!!!! Yoda is wrong: Obi Wan > Sidious

Maul > Qui Gon = Mace

Maul > Mace!

TPM Obi Wan > Maul > Qui Gon = Mace

TPM Obi Wan > Mace!

Yeah!

Fail

Originally posted by Hewhoknowsall
Anyway, who thinks that the team wins? Can anyone give an argument?