Originally posted by Allankles
A strawman is an argument, genius. I don't remember making an argument over SS. Stop using terms that don't even apply. Strawman (pfft), show me where I was making an argument, I was squashing an avenue for fanboy tangents, nothing more.
Erm, strawman is a form of argument which involves misrepresenting ur opponents position. By ur own admission u were squashing a point which u claimed(false claim) that i made. So in addition to no limit fallacies and deliberate ommision of context u can add strawmanning to ur list embarrasing debating techniques 🙂
Originally posted by Naija boyGibberish. The source wall may not be the powersource, but it needs to be acessed by takion in order for him to reach the"master of all reality powerlevels". How the hell can u then tell me that that detail is irrelevant in assesing Takions capabilities and powerlevel in a KMC environment in which the source wall will be absent? I really hope u dont take urself seriously.
I think you take yourself too seriously.
That's because the Source Wall was the place Takion needed to reach to heal it from. The Source Wall is only a physical barrier, Takion needed to touch the Source itself - the Source Wall was merely the place. Like I told you earlier the Source is already in Takion.
The Wall is irrelevant, it possess no power on its own.
The conflict arises with the existence of Stayne and the two battle it out for the fate of reality and the Source.
Stayne wanted Takion to touch the Source (not the wall) while she was there so that the taint would endure forever. Destroying each other would allow for one to control everything in existence or to control the reigns for their respective parties.
Originally posted by Naija boy
Erm, strawman is a form of argument which involves misrepresenting ur opponents position. By ur own admission u were squashing a point which u claimed(false claim) that i made. So in addition to no limit fallacies and deliberate ommision of context u can add strawmanning to ur list embarrasing debating techniques 🙂
Holy cow you have an overly inflated view of yourself. I never assumed you made a claim, i never referenced a claim you made, I never made an argument.
I made a statement to dissuade any possible argument i.e. covering my bases, that is not argumentation. I was not basing it on any assumed claim by anyone.
Originally posted by kevdude
🤪 Anyway, why is Starlin not in Marvel anymore?? Do you know? I've heard they've had some disagreements.
Originally posted by Allankles
[B]I think you take yourself too seriously.That's because the Source Wall was the place Takion needed to reach to heal it from. The Source Wall is only a physical barrier, Takion needed to touch the Source itself - the Source Wall was merely the place. Like I told you earlier the Source is already in Takion.
The Wall is irrelevant, it possess no power on its own.
The conflict arises with the existence of Stayne and the two battle it out for the fate of reality and the Source.
Stayne wanted Takion to touch the Source (not the wall) while she was there so that the taint would endure forever. Destroying each other would allow for one to control everything in existence or to control the reigns for their respective parties
/B]
I was referencing your statements when referring to the touching of the Source wall incident.
I dont care if the wall has power or no power. Its all irrelevant. The presence of an an external circumstance(him having to touch something, whatever it was) is all i care about. Hence its irrelevant here.
If Takion can control all reality without the presence of this external circumstance then show me an example of him doing such and that will be all.
Originally posted by Allankles
Holy cow you have an overly inflated view of yourself. I never assumed you made a claim, i never referenced a claim you made, I never made an argument.I made a statement to dissuade any possible argument i.e. covering my bases, that is not argumentation. I was not basing it on any assumed claim by anyone.
Overinflated view? Not really. huge dislike for nonsensical arguments? spot on.
You told me to "stop comparing surfer to takion". Indicating that i had compared surfer to Takion. Which was false. Ur statement indicated something i had already done/was supposedly still doing. All of which was false.